User talk:Barder2000

Welcome!
Welcome to the Infosphere! We're glad to have you as a member. If you need any help, feel free to ask anyone on the welcoming committee. You can also post questions on the FAQ talk page.

New users must read the Help pages before creating a new page.

Here are some tips to get you started:
 * If you need general information, editing tips, or answers to frequently asked questions, check out the help page.
 * Before you do any significant editing, be sure to familiarize yourself with our wiki standards and our Manual of Style.
 * If you have an idea for a major change that will help The Infosphere, suggest it over at the Conference Table.
 * If you want to create a new article, make sure that it doesn't already exist and that the article you've created is linked to from another article. Our article templates should help you out.
 * If you're not sure what you can do to help out, head over to current events.
 * To practice editing, go over to the playground.
 * You can help decide what's on the Main Page by voting on Featured Articles or making new nominations.


 * Above all, be sure to be bold and have fun!

Feel free to delete this message when you're done reading it. After all, your user space belongs to you. I hope this information is helpful, and that you'll have a good experience contributing to our knowledge-base and our community.

Sincerely,

Quolnok, and "The Infosphere Welcoming Committee" 09:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Birthday
Why did you remove the sections from the article? Sanfazer 20:07, 4 October 2011 (CEST)


 * It seemed that the "Appearances" section under "The Birthday Song" section was useless, because the appearances of the song were noted in the section below it (Additional Info). Please feel free to change back to the former version if I am wrong, but please explain to me why, so that I can further help this great wiki. - Barder2000 20:19, 4 October 2011 (CEST)
 * Those were only noted as being the appearances of birthdays, not the appearances of the song. Obviously, notes explaining that they are the appearances of both could be added, but, in my opinion, that would just make things confusing, when there is actually no need and we can be left with a clean article-in-an-article.
 * I am going to undo your edit. Thank you for being so cooperative. Sanfazer 21:13, 4 October 2011 (CEST)