Table:New rights for users

Discussion
Now that IPs need to request an account, and there is vandalism, it's time to give users more trust and IPs less. I think we should give THESE rights to users:

and revoke these from IPs:

Nalexa (talk) 06:53, 30 August 2015 (CEST)
 * Yes. I'm sick of the damn CAPTCHAs. Also, rollback would be useful for dealing with vandalism. Having to hit undo, save, type CAPTCHA and then save again was annoying. ☆ The   Solar   Dragon  ☆ 10:56, 30 August 2015 (CEST)
 * Definitely not prevent I.P.s from creating pages. Sanfazer: [ talk] 23:14, 30 August 2015 (CEST).

I don't like the idea of users immediately getting rollback. How about a futurama themed group, something like "Quantom Interphase Bombs" that can CREATEACCOUNT, DELETE, and ROLLBACK. We could also have our own protection level. Nalexa (talk) 06:15, 1 September 2015 (CEST)


 * That's basically an admin. If anyone wants to become an admin let them make a request. Sanfazer: [ talk] 23:22, 1 September 2015 (CEST).
 * Actually, it's a scaled-down version of admin. For example, here's a list of stuff admin can do but we couldn't:

There's more, but that's basically it. Nalexa (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2015 (CEST)
 * Anyone who can be trusted for deleting pages can be trusted for doing all the rest. Sanfazer: [ talk] 00:32, 3 September 2015 (CEST).
 * I have the ability to delete pages (with an alt) but I'm not an admin. Also, keep in mind that DELETE without BIGDELETE means only little pages with not very many revisions. Nalexa (talk) 02:41, 3 September 2015 (CEST)
 * A bot is not a regular user. No bot can be an admin. (At least not for a few more centuries.)
 * People can still wreck the wiki with it. Sanfazer: [ talk] 23:12, 3 September 2015 (CEST).
 * All of those things conflict : Please just pick one thing to say; I'm getting confused! Nalexa (talk) 03:07, 4 September 2015 (CEST)
 * What conflicts? Sanfazer: [ talk] 23:26, 4 September 2015 (CEST).