Table:Comedy Central Insider

Discussion
It seems that an image suspiciously similar to this Infosphere-original one has made it to Comedy Central Insider. Should we ask them to mention our image as a probable inspiration for it? Sanfazer (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2012 (CET)
 * Our image may be the inspiration, but whoever drew that picture drew their own picture. Moreover, the mating state seems to be missing from theirs (although, perhaps they did not consider that an 'evolutionary state').  I think it might be pushing unnecessarily for a 'mention' and will only make us seem too obsessed with getting mentioned, even for inspirations.
 * I am certain someone would will point out that our licence specifies that even if you alter the work (and our own images (including the Decapodian Life Cycle one) also falls under this licence), you - the alterer - are required to provide attribution for the work and share-alike, i.e. use the same or similar licence. However, an inspiration does not count for the same as an alternation.
 * To summarise: I think we should just let this one go. --Sviptalk 15:24, 25 January 2012 (CET)
 * I agree. Sanfazer (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2012 (CET)