Talk:Season 6

Recasting ploy article
A lot of people are talking, hell, more than usual, and I think the recasting thing is becoming so big, that it deserves its own article. With timelines, backgrounds, each side of the story and all that regular stuff. My only problem is simple. What to call the article? What is a good title that captures the essential? I don't want the title to imply they are actually recasting or that it is a tactic. But I suppose the latter will be a more fitting, as it is true. What you think of "20th Century Fox Television's Futurama recasting ploy" (if it happens again, we can just slap "2009" onto it) or "2009 recasting ploy" or is "ploy" even a good word? --SvipTalk 16:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

New source
since i'm no good at referencing and the like, here's an article with heaps of new information. hope you use it. --I&#39;m Scruffy... the Janitor. 00:04, 26 May 2010 (CEST)
 * I will, I just need to read it first. Unfortunately, I pretty much caught up in a lot of unrelated work this week, so I don't really have much time, but I will make it a priority during whatever free time I have.  But I apologise for not keeping this article up to date. --Sviptalk 01:06, 26 May 2010 (CEST)

Today's the day
I have waited for this moment. Get ready for the new season of Futurama, fellow Futurama Fans.

BenderZombie 08:03, 24 June 2010 (CEST)

Cleanup and update
So I cleaned up and updated the article a little. Thoughts? Aki 20:56, 15 December 2010 (CET)
 * It looks better. I particularly liked reading the Plot development section, but that's stil not using Template:Et the way we wanted. Any new ideas? San Saber 01:55, 16 December 2010 (CET)