Talk:The Infosphere (website)

"It started in January 30th, 2006, as a project off PEEL by 'Buddy13'. " -- If this means what I think it means, it's incorrect. By checking the join date on PEEL, one can see that I joined PEEL five days after starting the Infosphere. Also, it was apparently my birthday. But anyway. If I get some time, I'll work on this article a little bit later. I must admit, it is nice to finally be mentioned in an article. My dreams of being an article on Wikipedia will someday be fulfilled! --Buddy 05:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC) [edit]: BTW, the infinite recursion in the image pleases me to no end. --Buddy 05:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * that infinite recursion was my doing. yay!--My leg feels funny! 05:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If I do not recall incorrectly, Buddy, I think you have the ability to edit articles. :O!  Perhaps ye can shed some light on this wiki!? --SvipTalk 15:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what I meant, I just don't have time to get into it right now. Probably later tonight. I have noticed that I'm posting more suggestions and recommendations than actually editing things my-damn-self. Which I should. I guess I just got so used to it while I didn't have internet. --Buddy 17:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Merge?
jhhj:Well, I suppose it was more about us being asked about the proposal. We did weigh the options. I mean, combining strengths could have some advantage, and we might feel people would be less confused with only one Futurama wiki.
 * But... after considering it, we decided that it wasn't for us. And you can also flip one of those arguments and say; with two wikis, people have a chance to decide on which they will choose. --Sviptalk 10:49, 13 May 2010 (CEST)

Infobox image
I think that the infobox image should be File:The Infosphere Logo.png. Any opinions? Sanfazer (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2011 (CET)
 * I think it should, but the logo looks very fuzzy when it's enhanced to 225px. If we could get a higher quality version of the image, that's be great. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2011 (CET)
 * You're right. Though we could just enhance it to, for example, 100 while we don't have one. Sanfazer (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2011 (CET)
 * I'm not sure if I agree or disagree, however I do think there should be a logo history on the article, even though there's only been two (unless a previous one only lasted a couple of months) Can't actually see the old one on the site anywhere, but these guys have it. - Quolnok (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2011 (CET)

== Image gallery ==


 * How about this? Sanfazer (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2011 (CET)