Table:Places

Discussion
I want to introduce a "places" section to episode, comic, and film articles. The "places" section is analogous to the "characters" section. The two could therefore go under an "appearances" section.

I also propose creating templaces templates for the notes "mentioned in speech only" (Miso), "mentioned in text only" (Mito), and "mentioned in speech and text only" (Misato).

Here's a "places" section for the 6ACV23 article.

Places

 * Debut: Ben Franklin's print shop
 * Boston
 * Debut: Broadway
 * Charlotte (mentioned in speech only)
 * Columbus Circus (mentioned in text only)
 * Debut: Dunkin' Crumpets
 * England (mentioned in speech only)
 * Debut: Farningworthshire
 * Fifth Avenue
 * Georgia (mentioned in text only)
 * The Hall of Presidents
 * Debut: Harrods
 * The Head Museum
 * Debut: The Hitchcock Memorial
 * Lexington (mentioned in speech only)
 * Louisa (mentioned in speech only)
 * Maribel (mentioned in speech only)
 * Massachusetts
 * The moon
 * New Jersey (mentioned in speech only)
 * North Carolina (mentioned in text only)
 * Old New York
 * Debut: The Old North Church
 * Peru (mentioned in speech only)
 * Debut: Philadelphia
 * The Planet Express conference room
 * The Planet Express hangar
 * The Planet Express headquarters
 * South Carolina (mentioned in text only)
 * Tokyo (mentioned in speech only)
 * Virginia (mentioned in text only)
 * Debut: West Britannia

Will the new section and the new notes be adopted? What do the other administrators think? I hope each of them "places" his name in the "right" spot... Sanfazer (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2012 (CET).


 * I have no strong feelings one way or the other. --Sviptalk 22:14, 20 December 2012 (CET)


 * Don't do this. I don't think I can handle a tie.  Sanfazer (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2012 (CET).
 * I don't know, but my gut says "maybe". I've seen this on another wiki, where they had locations as sub-points of one another, and it looked terrible when there was only about 5 bullet points, each one indented slightly further than the one above. This is a nicer layout though, and the rule of wiki is to have plenty of different links to other pages. I'm leaning towards yes. - Quolnok (talk) 23:18, 21 December 2012 (CET)
 * What's the name of the wiki? Sanfazer (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2012 (CET).
 * Sounds like one that doesn't know how &lt;ul&gt;'s work. --Buddy (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2012 (CET)