Table:Places

Discussion
I want to introduce a "places" section to episode, comic, and film articles. The "places" section is analogous to the "characters" section. The two could therefore go under an "appearances" section.

I also propose creating templaces templates for the notes "mentioned in speech only" (Miso), "mentioned in text only" (Mito), and "mentioned in speech and text only" (Misato).

Here's a "places" section for the 6ACV23 article.

Places

 * Debut: Ben Franklin's print shop
 * Boston
 * Debut: Broadway
 * Charlotte (mentioned in speech only)
 * Columbus Circus (mentioned in text only)
 * Debut: Dunkin' Crumpets
 * England (mentioned in speech only)
 * Debut: Farningworthshire
 * Fifth Avenue
 * Georgia (mentioned in text only)
 * The Hall of Presidents
 * Debut: Harrods
 * The Head Museum
 * Debut: The Hitchcock Memorial
 * Lexington (mentioned in speech only)
 * Louisa (mentioned in speech only)
 * Maribel (mentioned in speech only)
 * Massachusetts
 * The moon
 * New Jersey (mentioned in speech only)
 * North Carolina (mentioned in text only)
 * Old New York
 * Debut: The Old North Church
 * Peru (mentioned in speech only)
 * Debut: Philadelphia
 * The Planet Express conference room
 * The Planet Express hangar
 * The Planet Express headquarters
 * South Carolina (mentioned in text only)
 * Tokyo (mentioned in speech only)
 * Virginia (mentioned in text only)
 * Debut: West Britannia

Will the new section and the new notes be adopted? What do the other administrators think? I hope each of them "places" his name in the "right" spot... Sanfazer (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2012 (CET).


 * I have no strong feelings one way or the other. --Sviptalk 22:14, 20 December 2012 (CET)


 * Don't do this. I don't think I can handle a tie.  Sanfazer (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2012 (CET).
 * I don't know, but my gut says "maybe". I've seen this on another wiki, where they had locations as sub-points of one another, and it looked terrible when there was only about 5 bullet points, each one indented slightly further than the one above. This is a nicer layout though, and the rule of wiki is to have plenty of different links to other pages. I'm leaning towards yes. - Quolnok (talk) 23:18, 21 December 2012 (CET)
 * What's the name of the wiki? Sanfazer (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2012 (CET).
 * Sounds like one that doesn't know how &lt;ul&gt;'s work. --Buddy (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2012 (CET)
 * I'll be very disappointed if it turns out to be the wiki which must not be named. Sanfazer (talk) 18:01, 22 December 2012 (CET).

Hi guys, I'm back from the cold death that is the world beyond the Infosphere. (Sorry, got caught up in school and politics (don't hit me).) And it's all for this one ballot! I vote... FOR! - akitalk 01:35, 23 December 2012 (CET)
 * Welcome back! Did you find out about this because you checked your email, or because you were perusing the recent changes of a postapocalyptic Infosphere? I wasn't expecting we'd hear from you this soon.  Sanfazer (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2012 (CET).
 * Thanks! Through the e-mail. I can't say I will start being active here again, but at least I'll start checking in once in a while. - akitalk 02:14, 23 December 2012 (CET)
 * That's better than nothing. Sanfazer (talk) 02:28, 23 December 2012 (CET).

Created the templates and edited the article, but what matters is in the end this page was edited in counteralphabetical order. Go figure that out. Sanfazer (talk) 03:53, 23 December 2012 (CET).
 * Neat! If only your name was Swanfazer, then it'd be perfect. - Quolnok (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2012 (CET)
 * Yeah, but it just wouldn't sound as menacing. Sanfazer (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2012 (CET).