Difference between revisions of "Table:Infosphere user"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{conference table thread}} | {{conference table thread}} | ||
<!-- Please always sign your comments with four tildes. --> | <!-- Please always sign your comments with four tildes. --> | ||
== Ballot == | |||
{| border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=6 style="border-collapse:collapse" | |||
|- bgcolor=#2363c3 | |||
! '''Infospherian''' !! '''Infospheroid''' !! '''Infospheran''' <!-- !! '''Word 4''' --> | |||
|- valign="top" | |||
| | |||
*[[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) | |||
*[[User:Trickymaster|Trickymaster]] ([[User talk:Trickymaster|talk]]) | |||
|| | |||
*[[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]]) | |||
*[[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) | |||
*[[User:Zylex13|Zylex13]] ([[User talk:Zylex13|talk]]) | |||
*[[User:Kif|Kif]] ([[User talk:Kif|talk]]) | |||
|| | |||
*[[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] ([[User talk:DeepSpaceHomer|talk]]) | |||
<!-- | |||
|| | |||
*~~~ | |||
--> | |||
|} | |||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Line 12: | Line 34: | ||
:Personally, I find most Wikipedians to be self-righteous assholes. (The robot devil said "That's alright, you can say that here.") I like "Spheroid" or "Spheronian" ... There are so many suffixes we could affix to "Infosphere"... 'spherite. 'spheron. 'spheroid. 'spherian. 'spheronian. 'spheritis. 'spherephobia. 'spherosis. 'spheritudinal. Wait, I think I got off track somewhere in there... *wanders off* --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]]) 10:38, 12 November 2011 (CET) | :Personally, I find most Wikipedians to be self-righteous assholes. (The robot devil said "That's alright, you can say that here.") I like "Spheroid" or "Spheronian" ... There are so many suffixes we could affix to "Infosphere"... 'spherite. 'spheron. 'spheroid. 'spherian. 'spheronian. 'spheritis. 'spherephobia. 'spherosis. 'spheritudinal. Wait, I think I got off track somewhere in there... *wanders off* --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]]) 10:38, 12 November 2011 (CET) | ||
::I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by ''us'' I mean... [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET) | ::I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by ''us'' I mean... [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET) | ||
:::I'm legally prohibited from relieving uncertainty. However, I do like to opine, and I think that "Infospheran" sounds good. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] ([[User talk:DeepSpaceHomer|talk]]) 04:11, 13 November 2011 (CET) | |||
:Perhaps a vote is in order? Can we do a vote with more than two options? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]]) 07:59, 13 November 2011 (CET) | |||
:::::Deep. Do you mean ''Infospherian''? | |||
:::::Buddy. We can, but, as far as I know, not with templates such as ''Infosphere:Accept''. I've taken the liberty to add a ballot box. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (CET) | |||
::::::No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman". Sounds better to my ears. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] ([[User talk:DeepSpaceHomer|talk]]) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET) | |||
:::::::Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET) | |||
::::::::As it isn't simply yes/no, I'd rather see this done in the form of preferential voting, wherein all voters can assign each option a rank, first choice given a 1 and so on, then the item with least votes has all it's votes reassigned to the voter's next preference. [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) 04:35, 14 November 2011 (CET) | |||
:::::::::Interesting. Can you set it up? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 19:31, 14 November 2011 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 18:32, 27 July 2012
Ballot
Infospherian | Infospheroid | Infospheran |
---|---|---|
|
Discussion
A Wikipedia user is a Wikipedian, but what is an Infosphere user? An Infospherian? An Infospheric? An Infospheroid? I don't know. Apparently, we don't have a name. And we need one, don't we?
I propose creating a project page similar to this one, only smaller. Of the three names that I mentioned, I like Infospherian the most. What about you?
Feel free to suggest other names. Sanfazer (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2011 (CET)
- Personally, I find most Wikipedians to be self-righteous assholes. (The robot devil said "That's alright, you can say that here.") I like "Spheroid" or "Spheronian" ... There are so many suffixes we could affix to "Infosphere"... 'spherite. 'spheron. 'spheroid. 'spherian. 'spheronian. 'spheritis. 'spherephobia. 'spherosis. 'spheritudinal. Wait, I think I got off track somewhere in there... *wanders off* --Buddy (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2011 (CET)
- I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by us I mean... Sanfazer (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET)
- I'm legally prohibited from relieving uncertainty. However, I do like to opine, and I think that "Infospheran" sounds good. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by us I mean... Sanfazer (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET)
- Perhaps a vote is in order? Can we do a vote with more than two options? --Buddy (talk) 07:59, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- Deep. Do you mean Infospherian?
- Buddy. We can, but, as far as I know, not with templates such as Infosphere:Accept. I've taken the liberty to add a ballot box. Sanfazer (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman". Sounds better to my ears. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. Sanfazer (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- As it isn't simply yes/no, I'd rather see this done in the form of preferential voting, wherein all voters can assign each option a rank, first choice given a 1 and so on, then the item with least votes has all it's votes reassigned to the voter's next preference. Quolnok (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2011 (CET)
- Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. Sanfazer (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman". Sounds better to my ears. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET)