Difference between revisions of "Talk:Futurama status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Harq al ada (talk | contribs) (→Move: I commented on a recent piece of news I feel is poorly supported.) |
m (Sanfazer moved page Talk:Second cancellation of Futurama to Talk:Futurama status over redirect) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Film == | == Film == | ||
I followed the link evidencing the creation of a fifth Futurama movie, it does mention that there has been talk about the creation of a new movie, but it's vague. Groening and Cohen have been implying it vaguely for a while, I'm not sure this article is a good basis for putting it as recent news dated to the release of this article. If there is a different article evidencing it more clearly, maybe the link should just be changed. [[User:harq al ada|harq al ada]] 05:28, 02 October 2013 | I followed the link evidencing the creation of a fifth Futurama movie, it does mention that there has been talk about the creation of a new movie, but it's vague. Groening and Cohen have been implying it vaguely for a while, I'm not sure this article is a good basis for putting it as recent news dated to the release of this article. If there is a different article evidencing it more clearly, maybe the link should just be changed. [[User:harq al ada|harq al ada]] 05:28, 02 October 2013 | ||
: There is no other article. To my knowledge, this is the only information about a possible fifth film that is available. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 20:13, 2 October 2013 (CEST). |
Latest revision as of 20:14, 2 October 2013
Move
It would make more sense for the page to be named Status, like Canon, which everyone knows refers to the canon of Futurama. (This being a Futurama wiki and all...) By the way, is that article's capitalised Canon in midsentence intentional? Sanfazer 23:56, 22 March 2011 (CET)
Film
I followed the link evidencing the creation of a fifth Futurama movie, it does mention that there has been talk about the creation of a new movie, but it's vague. Groening and Cohen have been implying it vaguely for a while, I'm not sure this article is a good basis for putting it as recent news dated to the release of this article. If there is a different article evidencing it more clearly, maybe the link should just be changed. harq al ada 05:28, 02 October 2013