Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Human"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the category for [[Sewer Mutants|mutants]] is [[:Category:Mutants]] and the category for [[Robot|robots]] is [[:Category:Robots]], shouldn't this category be named Category:Human<u>s</u> rather than Category:Human? There are a lot of humans, not only one. {{User:TheFry/sig}} | If the category for [[Sewer Mutants|mutants]] is [[:Category:Mutants]] and the category for [[Robot|robots]] is [[:Category:Robots]], shouldn't this category be named Category:Human<u>s</u> rather than Category:Human? There are a lot of humans, not only one. {{User:TheFry/sig}} | ||
:Unlike the word 'mutant' and 'robot', 'human' is also a state of being. So while you are technically correct (the best kind of correct), 'human' suffices within the appropriate context. That and the fact that we are too lazy to change the name of the category because that would require manually changing all its appearances. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | :Unlike the word 'mutant' and 'robot', 'human' is also a state of being. So while you are technically correct (the best kind of correct), 'human' suffices within the appropriate context. That and the fact that we are too lazy to change the name of the category because that would require manually changing all its appearances. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Oh, yeah, changing all pages with this category and that of the context. Ok, 'Human' is the correct name. {{User:TheFry/sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 01:01, 18 January 2010
If the category for mutants is Category:Mutants and the category for robots is Category:Robots, shouldn't this category be named Category:Humans rather than Category:Human? There are a lot of humans, not only one. — TheFry
- Unlike the word 'mutant' and 'robot', 'human' is also a state of being. So while you are technically correct (the best kind of correct), 'human' suffices within the appropriate context. That and the fact that we are too lazy to change the name of the category because that would require manually changing all its appearances. --Sviptalk 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, yeah, changing all pages with this category and that of the context. Ok, 'Human' is the correct name. — TheFry