Difference between revisions of "Commentary talk:The Beast with a Billion Backs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→F-bomb?) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::::Listened to it again. He says "...this robot that bucked him up and stoked his ego, but it seemed like too much on top of everything else." | :::::Listened to it again. He says "...this robot that bucked him up and stoked his ego, but it seemed like too much on top of everything else." | ||
I'll leave it to somebody else to decide though. -[[User:Mini-Me|Mini-Me]] 02:36, 3 August 2008 (CEST) | I'll leave it to somebody else to decide though. -[[User:Mini-Me|Mini-Me]] 02:36, 3 August 2008 (CEST) | ||
Alright, if somebody can prove it, it will go back up. I'm 100% positive he does not say "fucked" and it's a strong accusation/fact to leave up until confirmed. -[[User:Mini-Me|Mini-Me]] 07:11, 4 August 2008 (CEST) | |||
== "On DVD" == | == "On DVD" == | ||
Revision as of 07:11, 4 August 2008
F-bomb?
What? I listened to the thing multiple times and didn't hear a swear. Anybody have a time or scene? -Mini-Me 04:53, 5 July 2008 (BST)
- It's around the scene with Calculon's "surgery" --Anarchy Balsac 05:19, 5 July 2008 (BST)
- I think I've found what you're talking about. "It was this robot that buffed him up and stooped his ego. But... seemed like too much on top of everything else." Is it in that line? -18:49, 5 July 2008 (CEST)
- Are you sure he said buffed and not fucked? --Anarchy Balsac 23:45, 5 July 2008 (CEST)
- Absolutely. If I weren't sure, the topic David's speaking about makes no sense at all. -Mini-Me 19:09, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
- Oh come on, listen to it again, the word is clearly "fucked" not "buffed". Plus he said it during a discussion about relationships, so in that context it would make perfect sense, "buffed" however, would not.Anarchy Balsac 20:17, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
- Listened to it again. He says "...this robot that bucked him up and stoked his ego, but it seemed like too much on top of everything else."
- Are you sure he said buffed and not fucked? --Anarchy Balsac 23:45, 5 July 2008 (CEST)
- I think I've found what you're talking about. "It was this robot that buffed him up and stooped his ego. But... seemed like too much on top of everything else." Is it in that line? -18:49, 5 July 2008 (CEST)
I'll leave it to somebody else to decide though. -Mini-Me 02:36, 3 August 2008 (CEST)
Alright, if somebody can prove it, it will go back up. I'm 100% positive he does not say "fucked" and it's a strong accusation/fact to leave up until confirmed. -Mini-Me 07:11, 4 August 2008 (CEST)
"On DVD"
That "On DVD: On the DVD the film was released on" is a little confusing. I understand what it's saying now, but it's not clear at first (for people just visiting the site). -Mini-Me 19:17, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
- Suggest a better wording then, I'll gladly add it. --SvipTalk 19:13, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
- Should it even be required for the releases that only have one disk? -Mini-Me 19:17, 25 July 2008 (CEST)
- Hmm, does say "on" a few more than the ideal number of times, doesn't it. Perhaps the films' names should be there, they are the discs' identifier and that is the pattern of the other commentaries (link can still point to same place). - Quolnok 05:20, 26 July 2008 (CEST)
- Yah, that's a lot easier to understand for the movies. -Mini-Me 03:20, 27 July 2008 (CEST)
- Hmm, does say "on" a few more than the ideal number of times, doesn't it. Perhaps the films' names should be there, they are the discs' identifier and that is the pattern of the other commentaries (link can still point to same place). - Quolnok 05:20, 26 July 2008 (CEST)
- Should it even be required for the releases that only have one disk? -Mini-Me 19:17, 25 July 2008 (CEST)