|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:Meta]] | | [[Category:Meta]] |
| [[Image:Conference Table.jpg|right|thumb|Good morning, people.]]
| | {{conference table archive box}} |
| '''The Conference Table''' is for discussion of the Infosphere, and proposals for new ideas. For information about upcoming changes to the Infosphere, see [[Current events]]. | | This is the former page of the '''Conference Table''', please use [[Infosphere:Conference Table]] for creating new discussion. This is purely for history purposes. |
|
| |
|
| ==PE Building Floorplan== | | ==Background Jokes== |
| I'm asking for help. I have a few key episodes that I know of, but I'd like you guys to take any screenshots you can find (even low quality ones) and mail them to me (check my userpage for the email link). I'd like pictures of known areas of the PE building, covering as much of the floorplan as possible. Like in some scenes, you can see the TV area through the door in the conference room area (and that's pretty consistent, since on the outside, the TV area window is near where the conference table spot should be). Stuff like that. I'm going to start working on a map, and I'm hoping to be as accurate as possible. Areas that are difficult to locate should also be sent, and you can let me know where you think the area is. I'll color-code the map so speculative areas and canon areas are distinguishable. Thanks for the help. {{User:Buddy13/sig}} 14:19, 12 August 2006 (PDT)
| | :''Move to [[Table:Background Jokes]].'' |
| :Still no screenshots. I've got a few myself, and I'll start sketching out the floorplan. I'll be doing it in SVG, so I can post the work in progress and making changes will be easy. Any comments or such on where you think things are would be helpful. [[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:56, 24 December 2006 (PST)
| |
| :Still waiting. I will eventually get around to it myself. Like when I have internet at home, which will probably be around the same time the show comes back with new episodes. But if you guys aren't interested in seeing an extrapolation of the floorplan, then okay... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 11:38, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==ABSG Quota== | | == Referencing other episodes. == |
| I was listening to one of the commentaries (forgot which one) and [[John DiMaggio]] responded to a character's use of the word "Ass" by saying there had to be a quota for "Ass" and "Bastard". So I had a crazy idea to actually watch the show and count every occurrence, but I also remembered that in other commentaries, they'd said this show has the highest gasp-per-episode rating, and highest slaps as well. So I added them as well. So I started a tally of the number of "Ass", "Bastard", Slaps, and Gasps, and started making a chart. I know it's dumb, but it's fun. You can visibly see the slap count jump when [[Mom]] shows up. Anyway, I'm a few episodes into Season 2, and I thought I'd see what people thought of the idea. Here's what I have so far. The first spike is the first Mom episode ([[A Fishful of Dollars]]). I can't tell you which colour lines are what right now, but the coloured backgrounds are obviously the seasons. I've yet to add labels to any of it, but I will (in the appropriate Futurama font). {{User:Buddy13/sig}} 11:14, 30 November 2006 (PST)<br />
| | :''Move to [[Table:Referencing other episodes.]].'' |
| [[Image:ABSG.png|500px]]
| |
| :Heh heh, that's actually kind of cool. I expect the most "ass"es is going to be [[War is the H-Word]] - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 17:04, 30 November 2006 (PST)
| |
| ::"I can say ass again! Ass, ass, ass!"
| |
|
| |
|
| Still working on it. [[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:56, 24 December 2006 (PST)
| | == Image standards and choices == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Image standards and choices]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Okay, I now have a computer. I can watch DVD's and edit the SVG file at the same time, which may make this easier. I'm not guarantee'ing anything, because work and homework eat up a lot of time, but I do have next weekend off, so I may get some more of this done. Probably not the whole thing, as I can't watch two and a half seasons of Futurama in a single weekend (maybe if I was really determined), but I'll get a large chunk of it done. I'm not sure if anyone's interested anymore, but I'll finish it anyway. I'm eager to see the numbers for seasons 3 and 4, when I think they'll be the most consistently high... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 19:14, 19 February 2007 (PST)
| | == Levelling system == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Levelling system]].'' |
|
| |
|
| I've updated it. I'm still going slow. I've added two more episodes, and added a key/legend to it, as well as labeling the first season (can't remember why I didn't label the others...). I also made it larger (click to see the full size). Anyway, I'm not sure if I'll add a count to the left side (1 through 10) or label each dot as an individual episode. Labeling them would make it easier for other people to check/confirm the numbers, though... Input?
| | == Types of characters; splitting secondary characters into 3 == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Types of characters; splitting secondary characters into 3]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Man, I suck. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 11:38, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| | == Inline episode/film/comic references == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Inline episode/film/comic references]].'' |
|
| |
|
| == Lists == | | == ''Bender's Big Score'' on UMD? == |
| I think that some categories (such as planets, locations, Farnsworth inventions, non-Farnsworth technology, products, alien species, ships, animals, robots... ) must have an article with a list, as episodes or comics categories. The information in each item must be (at most) a very brief description, an image, and references to episodes. If an item has a bigger description or it is relevant, then it must have its own article linked from the corresponding list item (but preserving the brief description in the list). So, we avoid a possible large amount of short articles. What do you think? [[User:Bender22|Bender22]] 02:44, 9 December 2006 (PST)
| | :''Move to [[Table:Bender's Big Score on UMD?]].'' |
| :Yeah, you're probably right. (except for robots, those are still in the minor charaters page) - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 03:04, 9 December 2006 (PST)
| |
| :Personally, I'd love for everything to have an article of its own. But I think we should start with conglomerate pages, like the minor characters page. As more info is written, sections can be removed to their own pages. I know this won't work for things where very little is known, like [[Minor Characters#Shawn|Shawn]], since an entire article is a bit much just to say "This is Leela's boyfriend that we never see." Anyway... *runs off* —[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:56, 24 December 2006 (PST)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Main Images== | | == Needing Image Template == |
| For most of the episodes and articles, the main image (usually the one at the upper right) is named the same as the article, with a .jpg at the end. Should we adopt this as a standard and make sure that all articles follow it? It would make finding images easier, for one thing. And article editors would automatically know the name of the image that goes there... Vote please:
| | :''Move to [[Table:Needing Image Template]].'' |
|
| |
|
| {{Infosphere:Accept}}
| | == Donations for new server == |
| {{User:Electricbolt/sig}}<br>{{User:Gravemind/sig}}
| | :''Move to [[Table:Donations for new server]].'' |
| {{Infosphere:Decline}}
| |
|
| |
|
| {{Infosphere:End}}
| | == Main Page suggestions == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Main Page suggestions]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Looks like this passed, I guess we'll need to start searching through articles and replacing them. The easiest way is to just use <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki>.jpg on the templates, and maybe even on the already-created articles. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 11:38, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| | == Notability == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Notability]].'' |
|
| |
|
| ==Detailed Cast== | | == Reception and production == |
| Just an idea. How about a detailed cast list for every episode, as in type what characters that the voice actors play in the episode. Since this is a large scale idea, it will probably be declined but it's an idea nevertheless. <small>--''The preceding unsigned comment was made by [[Special:Contributions&target=172.201.33.229|172.201.33.229]]''</small>
| | :''Move to [[Table:Reception and production]].'' |
| :This actually might be a good idea, but could clutter up the ep articles, and adding another article per episode could be a bit much... Ideas on how to work this would be great. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 12:51, 11 January 2007 (PST)
| |
| ::Perhaps a detailed list per season with subsections for easch episode? - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 18:41, 17 February 2007 (PST)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Infosphere Logo== | | == Animatics == |
| I think it should be redesigned, and you?
| | :''Move to [[Table:Animatics]].'' |
| I could try to make a new one, doesanybody have the background Image with the Infosphere? - [[User:Bofr@|Bofr@]]
| |
| :Personally, I like the current logo, however there may be other designs that are better, more modern and sound more green. Feel free to have a go at making a new one. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 15:48, 28 January 2007 (PST)
| |
| :I snipped the Infosphere out of [[:Image:Infosphere.jpg|this image]], the light-ray background was created in photoshop (radial gradient, noise-type, bluish-cyan and black) and it's far from perfect. The text is, in order, Dungeon font, Futurama Title Bold font, Futurama Title font, the latter two with Photoshop effects on them to emulate those seen in the show. If you wanna make a new one, go ahead, and we'll vote on new versions here. → {{User:buddy13/sig}} 11:47, 29 January 2007 (PST)
| |
|
| |
|
| I'm still open to a redesign, but maybe it'll wait until an upgrade is achieved. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 11:38, 19 April 2007 (PDT) | | == Something I'ma work on. == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Something I'ma work on.]].'' |
|
| |
|
| ==Other Languages== | | == I demand more connections! == |
| What do you think of other Languages, do you want them here, and is it possible to put them in?
| | :''Move to [[Table:I demand more connections!]].'' |
| I'd like to start translating some Sites starting with the Characters and or Episode List, so
| |
| what do you think? Bofr@
| |
| :I think Infosphere in another language would be good but its Buddy's decision what language were you thinking of starting with Bofr@ - {{User:Humerbot 0.4/sig}} | |
|
| |
|
| :Since I'm german, i'd like to start with the German language :) | | == Categories for voice actors? == |
| ::I think Buddy might be more open to a variant in a language he or another sysop knows, due to the need to keep standards reasonably high. I certainly can't do much for a non-english wiki, unless we write it in a programming language, which we shouldn't. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 15:31, 29 January 2007 (PST)
| | :''Move to [[Table:Categories for voice actors?]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Another language would be great, but I don't have the capability to support multiple languages on the same server like Wikipedia does (at least, I ''think'' that's what they're doing)... Alternative solutions would be welcome. Was Futurama dubbed into German? The only languages I know of are Spanish and (Canadian) French. Though I know one of the discs has a special feature and it has about five or six languages on it, so who knows. Pick a random article (or one you really like) and translate it into German. Save it at "Article Name (German)" as a sort of test. Just one article for now. Till then, I'll have to think about it. Mull it over. Let it stew. You know. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 16:20, 29 January 2007 (PST)
| | == Calling all Nerdlingers! == |
| ==300!== | | :''Move to [[Table:Calling all Nerdlingers!]].'' |
| We've reached over 300 articles - [[User:Humorbot 0.4|Humorbot 0.4]] 05:32, 24 February 2007 (PST)
| |
| It's like that movie... What's the one? Oh yeah, War Games. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 13:18, 23 March 2007 (PDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Monobook.css and "pretty URLs"== | | == Oh yes, I forgot... == |
| '''CSS''': I have a proposal for a CSS change (along with a screenshot) on my [[User:Svip|userpage]]. Suggestions at its talk page are welcome. | | :''Move to [[Table:Oh yes, I forgot...]].'' |
|
| |
|
| '''Pretty URLs''': I have noticed how this wiki lacks the pretty URLs, if it runs on an apache machine, it would be fairly easy to make it happen. I have done this with tonnes of Wikis of my own. | | == Infosphere:Portal == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Infosphere:Portal]].'' |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:Svip|Svip]] 07:36, 8 March 2007 (PST) | | == Chinese Infosphere - coming up == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Chinese Infosphere - coming up]].'' |
|
| |
|
| == A universal template for all appearance articles (e.g. characters/items) == | | == Linking to Redirects == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Linking to Redirects]].'' |
|
| |
|
| I am proposing an universal template for all articles which describe something that appears in an episode (or more) or in a comic (or more). Its purpose is to keep (and easily update) a general style for all articles. Currently it is all "hardcoded" into each article. A bad option if you ask me. And if you get the parse extension for MediaWiki, you can have if statements and thus if something is unrelated to something (e.g. you don't want "voiced by" on for an item). --[[User:Svip|Svip]] 14:16, 9 March 2007 (PST)
| | == Pixelations == |
| : Also, I would propose calling the template "infobox", so it is universal right there. Or perhaps "appearance infobox" if you wish. --[[User:Svip|Svip]] 14:17, 9 March 2007 (PST) | | :''Move to [[Table:Pixelations]].'' |
| :: And of course special templates for comic and episode articles. --[[User:Svip|Svip]] 14:48, 9 March 2007 (PST)
| |
| :::Might be good. Always worth a test. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 18:12, 17 March 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::::Oh right, I created this ([[Template:Character_infobox]]) as an example for how a character infobox could look like. --[[User:Svip|Svip]] 04:00, 18 March 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :::::Whoops! I scanned but somehow missed this before starting the new infobox section below yesterday. I'm also a big supporter of installing the parser functions extension, if you haven't already (haven't actually checked). The #if function in particular is essential for doing nice-looking, flexible, general-purpose infoboxes. [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 08:46, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Navigating season five== | | == Season 6 is fact == |
| Because season five is to be released in a slightly odd manner, groups of four episodes making up four movies, I've done a new batch of [[Template:EpisodeNavTemplateV2|Nav templates. These]] point to both episodes and movie articles. My proposed nav for the DVD movies has two versions on that page, I think the second is the better one, however it does require ten variables to be passed to it, which may result in some confusion for article creators. It's variable numbers will be changed to a more logical order before use. Also because the movie navs may point back at either an episode or a movie I just left the labels as "Next" and "Previous". - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 18:12, 17 March 2007 (PDT)
| | :''Move to [[Table:Season 6 is fact]].'' |
| :Also when the tittles are confirmed we can probably just hard code the movie names to the Devil's Hands nav template (also for 6ACV01 nav, if applicable) - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 18:18, 17 March 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::Well they certainly look good I think I prefer the 2nd DVD nav template it would be easier, in my opinion, to use. - [[User:Humorbot 0.4|Humorbot 0.4]] 03:18, 18 March 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::Agreed. Number 2 looks good. It's going to be a long time before they have commentaries, though. ;) --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 13:03, 23 March 2007 (PDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Video Clips in Opening Sequence? == | | == More Categories == |
| | :''Moved to [[Table:More Categories]]''. |
|
| |
|
| By now, I assume you are all familiar with the short clips seen in each episode's opening sequence. Yet, no episode articles describes where these clips are from, cause according to Wikipedia they are from somewhere. Perhaps we should include those? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 17:00, 13 April 2007 (PDT)
| | == Forum style for the Conference Table? == |
| :Yeah, go ahead and add them to whatever area you think is best. Wikipedia probably is the best source, but the commentaries also sometimes mention where they're from... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 08:10, 14 April 2007 (PDT)
| | :''Moved to [[Table:Forum style for the Conference Table?]]''. |
| ::Hm, but at the same time I felt we should add a better template for our articles, similar to the template I created for characters: [[Template:Character infobox]]. So I kinda need your opinion on such templates. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 04:27, 15 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Thumbnail Size==
| |
| Am I the only one who thinks our default thumbnail size is way too small? {{User:Gopher/sig}} [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 16:46, 18 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :The default size is probably configurable, but you can also adjust your personal thumb size in your preferences section. Mine is set to 180px, which I assume is the default, since I don't remember changing my setting. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 11:38, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Infoboxes?==
| |
| | |
| How would everyone feel about introducing infoboxes for the standard article types, to supplement the existing article seed templates? Consitent formatting is only half the battle, our articles tend to be a bit unprofessional-looking compared to other immitation-worthy wikis (wikipedia, Starbase Alpha). Using [[Jurassic Bark]] as a guinea pig, I've set up a simple infobox and moved some of the common information to it. If people like the idea, we'll tweak the infobox a bit first and when everyone's happy, I'll start building the formal infobox templates.
| |
| {{User:Gopher/sig}} [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 16:46, 18 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :I think I looks good and we could use the character infoboxes Svip has created too - [[User:Humorbot 0.4|Humorbot 0.4]] 08:10, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Redirects, part deux==
| |
| :Goph here; I was one of the original proponents of the "no redirects" rule, but I've learned two things since then that have caused me to concider reevaluating my position; it no longer seems so clear-cut. In particurlar, when developing slick, professional infoboxes, things like redirects of 1ACV02 to [[The Series Has Landed]] can be quite useful - combined with parser functions, valid links could be generated dynamically much more easily. Just suggesting maybe we reopen this as an actual discussion of the pros/cons, and put aside the vote for a bit? [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 11:14, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| I'm starting to think redirects are okay, but they should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Production numbers are a given. Professionals and convicts: Pros for redirects: easier for users to find what they need; Cons: Using search spits out forty redirects. I hate that about Wikipedia. Just gimme the damn article. It's probably OCD or something on my part, but when it says "Redirected from..." under the article title, I click on "Article" to remove it. I'm probably nuts for hating redirects, but I do. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 11:38, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :Added a list to allow others to contribute pros/cons, and populated it with all the pros/cons I can think of, including a few which are probably a bit of a stretch. I can think of a lot of pros, though most are minor, but only a few negatives, just off the top of my head. [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 12:37, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| ===Pros===
| |
| * Easier searching for common articles with unexpected names ([[Bender Bending Rodriguez]], for example)
| |
| * Easier linking to common articles (simply <nowiki>[[Bender]] instead of [[Bender Bending Rodriguez|Bender]]</nowiki>)
| |
| * New contributors with good intentions will not be put off
| |
| :This one is very important. The more users, the better. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 12:54, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| * More friendly with pretty links and external links
| |
| * More search-engine friendly
| |
| :This might be the clincher for me; we're still doing terribly in the google search results for most topics last time I checked, but I'm no expert on SEO [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 12:37, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::It depends on what you're looking for. "Futurama" on google has us somewhere on the fourth or fifth page. But "Futurama Wiki" has us listed right after the Wikipedia entry. Quite nice. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 12:54, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :Really? That's good, and a big improvement over last time I checked, but I just re-checked and "Futurama Bender" and "Futurama Fry" didn't turn us up in the first 10 pages. "Futurama Leela" turns up a link on page 7 - but it's to the article on [[Leela's Homeworld]], rather than the [[Turanga Leela]] article.
| |
| ::A side-door's better than no door at all. ;) --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 13:13, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| Can I say I found this site by searching futurama wiki on google and you were about 3rd Gouranga
| |
| ::Yes, you may. And third only if you count the second Wikipedia link. But seeing as it's an indented sub-link-type-thing, I count them as a single set of links, therefore, we're second, right after Wikipedia. :D --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 13:05, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| ===Cons===
| |
| * Rubs buddy the wrong way
| |
| :I think you're alone on the "Redirected from..." pet peeve, buddy, I don't even notice them myself, but we'll see what others say.
| |
| ::I told you I was nuts. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 12:57, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| * Obfuscates search results
| |
| :You mentioned this, buddy, but I'm not sure what you mean. Could you give an example search and it's fuzzy results? Heavy use of redirects and disambiguation pages are a necessary evil on Wikipedia because it's scope is so broad, but it wouldn't be so bad here, I don't think. And note that regardless of our position on redirects, I think we should avoid disambig pages if at all possible. I can't think of a case where they would be necessary in the Futurama universe. [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 12:37, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::Okay, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=pants&fulltext=Search bad example], but you can see the first result is a redirect. I've seen worse, where the first ten or more are redirects, but I can't think of anything right now. But you're right, this probably wouldn't be too big of a problem on the Infosphere. I wonder if there's some way to exclude redirects from search results by default... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 12:57, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| * Increased load on the server
| |
| :Not certain on this, but it's something someone told me on another small, private wiki. Anyone confirm/deny (with facts, not just speculation)?
| |
| ::This one's not a problem right now; we're still <em>way</em> under the limit for both bandwidth and diskspace. Hakuna Matata and all that. [update]: Yeah, I just checked, even with my base site included (overt-ops.com), bandwidth is an estimated 2350MB for this "cycle" (i.e., month), with an allocated 2840GB available. That's less than one percent we're using. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 12:57, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :True, but the goal is to become the definitive futurama resource, so we should try to think ahead, rather than paint ourselves into a corner now and scramble to fix it later. That's assuming it's actually an issue at all, though, which is not proven. [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 13:07, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::Like you said, our focus is so narrow it probably won't be a concern. And sorry about the edit conflicts. It's too complicated for me to figure out... Anyway, yeah. We'll probably be fine on this count. -- [[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 13:10, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::Okay, apparently I forgot the ratio of MB to GB. It's actually 43%, not 1%. But Dreamhost is awesome enough to actually increase the bandwidth based on how long I'm hosted there, and it's a 16GB/week, so as long as our growth doesn't exceed that, we'll be fine. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 13:18, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :::And given how our content is mostly text and images, this is highly unlikely to ever be a problem and don't worry about CPU usage as well, I assure you MediaWiki is optimised. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:21, 19 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| == Fry and the Slurm Factory Lyrics ==
| |
| I was wondering if on the page [[Fry and the Slurm Factory]]. We could get the lyrics for the songs? I like them and think it would be a good addition to the page as many people I know have wondered what the lyrics are.
| |
| [[User:Gouranga|Gouranga]] (10:00, 21 April 2007 (PDT))
| |
| | |
| == IRC channel ==
| |
| | |
| Though, I am unsure wither or not this wiki have an IRC channel where people meet, and in a similar fashion, I haven't been able to find its appearance on the website. However, I have for a while now been running a channel for the Infosphere on Freenode.org.
| |
| | |
| Link: [irc://irc.freenode.org/infosphere freenode.org #infosphere]
| |
| | |
| If unsure how to use IRC, I suggest trying some of the following clients:
| |
| | |
| * [http://mirc.com mIRC] - considered one of the most popular clients, though I do not prefer it. Windows only. Trail version, though it only annoys you when starting it up, to avoid the annoyance, you will have to pay.
| |
| * [http://xchat.org X-chat] - great client, it is simple, it has its annoyances, where mIRC has its advantages. For Mac OS X, Linux and Windows. Free, though the Windows version is not free.
| |
| * [http://irssi.org irssi] - text based client, for the more "leet" of you. For Mac OS X and Linux. Free.
| |
| Other clients worth suggesting: [http://ircle.com IRCle] (Mac OS X), [http://www.pidgin.im/ Pidgin IRC (formerly GAIM)] (Windows, Linux, Mac OS X), [http://opera.com Opera] (Windows, Linux, Mac OS X) (this is part of the browser). There is also [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/16/ ChatZilla] for you Firefox users out there.
| |
| | |
| ''You may also want to see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_Relay_Chat_clients Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients] on Wikipedia for more clients.''
| |
| | |
| ===What to do when having the client===
| |
| | |
| It varies from client to client for what to do, the GUI (Graphical User Interface) clients often has a server list, sometimes in the same window it is possible to select a preferred nickname, and an alternative nickname if that nickname should for any reason be taken (remember, only one person can have a specific nickname on a network, much like I am the only ''Svip'' on this Wiki).
| |
| | |
| From the list, Freenode is usual an option, but with the IRC client installed, it might just work pressing the link above. At any rate, if you are not in the channel, but only on the network, perform the command '''/join #infosphere''' simply by typing it and hitting return.
| |
| | |
| I suggest picking a name as relative to your Wiki name as possible. There may be problems for this. Also, I suggest registering your nickname, so no one else will steal it at a later point. This is done by writing to ''nickserv'' and asking for ''help register''. Command: '''/msg nickserv help register'''
| |
| | |
| ===What to use the channel for=== | |
| Now, the Wiki is a method of discussing things and also saving them at the same time. However, an IRC channel is a chat, and is thus live, and can provide some ease of accessibility between each user, and also getting to know each other easier, and perhaps also discussing things outside of this Wiki.
| |
| | |
| At any rate, I couldn't see the damage. I hope to see some of you there. :)
| |
| | |
| --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:10, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| == Transcript articles? ==
| |
| | |
| What about having episode articles just like the commentary articles with transcripts? I know it will become a hassle, but shouldn't be top priority, but at least it would be nice to get some transcripts out of the episodes. Transcripts should also include writing on walls, with both Latin and other cipher alphabets. Supposingly, some sites may already be keeping such transcripts of Futurama episodes, we could refer to them for information. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:39, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| There is a site with transcripts available. In this case I am fairly sure the host will NOT allow us to duplicate them (though if you'd like to ask, go ahead), but linking to them is a different matter. Might want to contact him, but we could set up something to use season and production code prameters in the infobox template to generate an automatic link to the transcripts. The site is [www.geocities.com/theneutralplanet The Neutral Planet]. I don't see any reason to duplicate them, personally; they're complete and organized on TNP. [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 17:48, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| : On his website, he says that anyone can add his transcripts to their website, just noting him first. [http://www.geocities.com/theneutralplanet/misc/support.html See here]: "''You can also add any number of the regular series transcripts to your site. Just contact me before adding them so I know where they're going''". --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 02:45, 23 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| Yeah, but I feel linking to be the best option. We're an encyclopedia. Check Wikipedia, and you'll note that there's not a single transcript (except for short things like poems). If you look up a book, like Moby Dick, you'll not find a "transcript". But as we want to be the best resource for info, I do think linking would be fine. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 16:11, 24 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| == Standards suggestions ==
| |
| | |
| I am not trying to sound like a commie, however it would be cool if I did. But I have some standard suggestions in my pocket, accept them or shove 'em. (I am adding my signature to all the lines so you can your opinion right below it without causing "CONFUSION EXPLOSION" (term I just made up))
| |
| | |
| First of all, category names. I have noticed that category names are singular, however since a category is a category of things, and things are usually plural, so I am not sure which to pick, plural or singular. Though I would prefer plural. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :I think several <em>are</em> already plural, like "Robots" or something. In fact, looking at the list, most of them do appear to be plural. But if a standard is needed to bring the rest into line, go right ahead. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 14:58, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| Secondly, "lists". A lot of articles state a list of items with reference to the subject at hand. E.g. [[Robot 1-X]] state functions, however, I suggest we should avoid that saying, and say "Known Functions" instead. For it is ignorant to suggest that we know all its functions, that we know all the creations the professor have created, and so forth. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :I'd agree with this one. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 14:58, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| Thirdly, image names. My most recent example is [[:Image:Montholdbender.png]], I got confused with the "mont" and the "hold", though "mont" is not an English word, I would have preferred if the image name had been ''Month Old Bender.png'' instead. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:07, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :I think I mentioned something similar farther up the page for Main Images, but yes. Weird names are weird. I think a lot of it stems from the olden times when you could only have eight letters before the file extension. So people compress things needlessly. Also, some graphics programs do that anyway. Someone with lots of time could save the image to hard drive, rename it, re-upload it, replace all links to it, and then mark the old one for deletion. I wish the Wiki had the ability to just "Move" image. :( --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 14:58, 22 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::It actually kinda do... if you say "upload a new version", you can pick a new name for the image. This will link the "former" names of the image to the new one as a redirect. This just means that while cleaning up articles, the images won't be missing. I think. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 02:48, 23 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| Fourthly, dates. I know you Americans love ''month/date/year'', but that is really not a standard, hell, even the Wiki software writes it in ''date month year'' structure. I suggest therefore, as a standard we use the International standard for dates. Also, I don't see a reason to write st/nd/rd/th in superscript on written dates like "17 November". Remember, you may say "November 17" out loud, but writings are not always as spoken. And yes, I am biased because I am European. "Look at my crazy passport!" --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 08:12, 23 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| :I agree but I'm proberbly bias as well - [[User:Humorbot 0.4|Humorbot 0.4]] 08:15, 23 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| :Futurama is an American show. I think that's argument enough for using the American dating system. Also, my own personal standard is YYYYMMDD-HHMM, so right now it's 20070424-1713. Which is way better. :P --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 16:21, 24 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| ::Buddy, so I'm not the only one? That's my prefered format as well, though I usually do YYYYMMDD:HH:MM (semantic difference). That way they sort properly without fancy date-comparison routines. As a typical, arrogant, self-absorbed American, I say we stick with the American date format. I'm also a big fan of "September 18<sup>th</sup>" instead of "September 18." The former seems more formal and correct, while the latter just feels lazy. And "18 September?" That's just crazy! heheh. Bottom line, I don't really care that much one way or the other, so I'll let those who do fight it out. Just tell me who wins. [[User:Gopher|Gopher]] 18:30, 24 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| | |
| == This wiki's own domain? ==
| |
| | |
| I am feeling that the URL for this wiki is perhaps a bit odd, and more importantly, "overt-ops" is rather forgettable. In fact, I think some only spot the "futurama" in the URL. I'm just thinking if we should buy futuramawiki.net or something else, I am willing to pay for it. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 09:07, 23 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| :Sure, go to the main page, scroll to the bottom, click on "Donations" and send in all or some of the required $9.95 for registering a new domain. And suggest a good domain, since "infosphere.com" and "theinfosphere.com" are taken. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 16:22, 24 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
| ::Hm... "infosphere" in a domain will probably be hard to get. And besides, people will more like remember 'futuramawiki' over 'infosphere', though I cannot be sure, as I am not people, and in turn not Soylent Green. Give me a list of suitable names, and I shall do a search... --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 16:32, 24 April 2007 (PDT)
| |
