Difference between revisions of "Infosphere talk:Rules"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I wouldn't know about that, but it probably should, yeah. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 02:36, 26 December 2010 (CET) | :I wouldn't know about that, but it probably should, yeah. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 02:36, 26 December 2010 (CET) | ||
::It can be assumed. However it kind of fits into "The Infosphere is not a fan fiction" and "Not your personal playground", usually more the later. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 04:55, 26 December 2010 (CET) | ::It can be assumed. However it kind of fits into "The Infosphere is not a fan fiction" and "Not your personal playground", usually more the later. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 04:55, 26 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:Quolnok's right. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 16:33, 26 December 2010 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 17:33, 26 December 2010
Vandalism
Should vandalism be mentioned, or is it to be assumed? Aki 00:13, 25 December 2010 (CET)
- I wouldn't know about that, but it probably should, yeah. San Saber 02:36, 26 December 2010 (CET)
- It can be assumed. However it kind of fits into "The Infosphere is not a fan fiction" and "Not your personal playground", usually more the later. - Quolnok 04:55, 26 December 2010 (CET)
- Quolnok's right. San Saber 16:33, 26 December 2010 (CET)