Difference between revisions of "File talk:Bum Base Alpha.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Ah. Okay. I guess that makes sense. It just doesn't look very good or neat when it's used in an infobox. I see what he was going for, but it might work better if we just got one image. [[User:Kif|Kif]] ([[User talk:Kif|talk]]) 02:14, 5 September 2012 (CEST) | :Ah. Okay. I guess that makes sense. It just doesn't look very good or neat when it's used in an infobox. I see what he was going for, but it might work better if we just got one image. [[User:Kif|Kif]] ([[User talk:Kif|talk]]) 02:14, 5 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
::Yep, it's an old pre-infobox upload, which I believe was given much more space originally. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) 03:52, 5 September 2012 (CEST) | ::Yep, it's an old pre-infobox upload, which I believe was given much more space originally. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] ([[User talk:Quolnok|talk]]) 03:52, 5 September 2012 (CEST) | ||
:::Okay, then, we can agree that we need to replace it with one image. [[User:Kif|Kif]] ([[User talk:Kif|talk]]) 22:51, 5 September 2012 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:51, 5 September 2012
This is so terribly cropped, it's not even funny. I don't know how to mark it as such, so I'm using this page to bring it to the community's attention. Kif (talk) 20:10, 3 September 2012 (CEST)
- Actually, it isn't cropped. Buddy spliced together several screenshots. Full resolution is 2,506 × 540 pixels, with 540 being roughly standard DVD image height. You'd normally use one of the templates in Category:Wiki Maintenance probably {{Image update}}. Someone will probably look at those eventually... - Quolnok (talk) 02:43, 4 September 2012 (CEST)
- Ah. Okay. I guess that makes sense. It just doesn't look very good or neat when it's used in an infobox. I see what he was going for, but it might work better if we just got one image. Kif (talk) 02:14, 5 September 2012 (CEST)
