Difference between revisions of "New New York v. Santa Bender"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|name=New New York v. Santa Bender | |name=New New York v. Santa Bender | ||
|image= | |image= | ||
|occurred=[[ | |occurred=[[New New York Court]], {{year|3001}} | ||
|location=[[Earth]] | |location=[[Earth]] | ||
|first appear={{elink|3ACV03|A Tale of Two Santas}} | |first appear={{elink|3ACV03|A Tale of Two Santas}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''New New York v. Santa Bender''' case was a trial by the [[ | The '''New New York v. Santa Bender''' case was a trial by the [[New New York Court]], with the Honourable [[Judge Whitey]] presiding. Being mistaken for the real [[Santa Claus]], [[Bender]] is brought before Judge Whitey to be tried for his "crimes" against humanity. [[Pramala]] was the witness in the trail. The decision of the judge was that Santa Bender was guilty because "I have a ham dinner with mayonnaise waiting for me at my mansion". Santa Bender was sentenced to be executed at sundown. | ||
==Additional Info== | ==Additional Info== | ||
Revision as of 03:42, 16 March 2009
| New New York v. Santa Bender | |
|---|---|
| Occurred | New New York Court, 3001 |
| First appearance | "A Tale of Two Santas" (3ACV03)  |
The New New York v. Santa Bender case was a trial by the New New York Court, with the Honourable Judge Whitey presiding. Being mistaken for the real Santa Claus, Bender is brought before Judge Whitey to be tried for his "crimes" against humanity. Pramala was the witness in the trail. The decision of the judge was that Santa Bender was guilty because "I have a ham dinner with mayonnaise waiting for me at my mansion". Santa Bender was sentenced to be executed at sundown.