Difference between revisions of "Table:I've been thinking...."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- Do not remove this. --> {{conference table thread}} <!-- Please always sign your comments with four tildes. --> == Discussion == Hey, I think that Futurama is subtly im...") |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hey, I think that Futurama is subtly implying that humans do '''not''' have freewill. In the farnsworth paradox we learn that the difference between the two universes is something with coins. Coins are manmade, they are ''not'' a part of nature. So the only way they could get involved with nature is if they were already going to be invented, right? [[User:Nalexa|Nalexa]] ([[User talk:Nalexa|talk]]) 05:30, 11 December 2014 (CET) | Hey, I think that Futurama is subtly implying that humans do '''not''' have freewill. In the farnsworth paradox we learn that the difference between the two universes is something with coins. Coins are manmade, they are ''not'' a part of nature. So the only way they could get involved with nature is if they were already going to be invented, right? [[User:Nalexa|Nalexa]] ([[User talk:Nalexa|talk]]) 05:30, 11 December 2014 (CET) | ||
:Come to think of it, the universes are also older than coins, so it would have already been decided that coins would be invented since the beginning of time. [[User:Nalexa|Nalexa]] ([[User talk:Nalexa|talk]]) 05:33, 11 December 2014 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 06:33, 11 December 2014
Discussion
Hey, I think that Futurama is subtly implying that humans do not have freewill. In the farnsworth paradox we learn that the difference between the two universes is something with coins. Coins are manmade, they are not a part of nature. So the only way they could get involved with nature is if they were already going to be invented, right? Nalexa (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2014 (CET)