Table:So slowwwww

Conference Table

Discussion

Is it just on my end, or has the site been incredibly sluggish the last week or two? --Buddy (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2012 (CET)

So yucking sluggish. Sanfazer (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2012 (CET).

I have recognised this slowness for weeks by now, and I apologise. Tonight, I finally got an opportunity to do something about it. I hope you'll recognise this increase in speed as well. --Svip^talk 00:47, 23 January 2013 (CET)

I wouldn't say it's got cheetah blood rubbed on its engine, but it's definitely an improvement. Good job :-D --Buddy (talk) 05:49, 23 January 2013 (CET)

Well, it was working well for a while, then it became incredibly slow again. I think I might have solved it now, though. --Svip^talk 18:35, 23 January 2013 (CET)

Wow, seems to be working beautifully now! --Buddy (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2013 (CET)

Well, I hope you are all pleased with the new speeds. It seems to be working great now. --Svip^talk 00:53, 29 January 2013 (CET)

It really does. Sanfazer (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2013 (CET).

The pool is a little off, however.

In other news, happy birthday, Infosphere! (Hasn't she grown? I trust the father is very excited. Seven is always special.) Sanfazer (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2013 (CET).

It was so slow that I was unable to comment on the slowness, even. Evidently this is no longer the case. Huzzahs are in order. - Quolnok (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2013 (CET)

I assume Amy is the father. --Svip^talk 13:38, 31 January 2013 (CET)

She may be a father, but, boy, does she look good in a pool. Sanfazer (talk) 19:07, 31 January 2013 (CET).

I've decided to improve the speed even more:

Server Software:        Apache/2.2.16
Server Hostname:        theinfosphere.org
Server Port:            80

Document Path:          /Special:Random
Document Length:        0 bytes

Concurrency Level:      1
Time taken for tests:   1.009 seconds
Complete requests:      50
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Non-2xx responses:      50
Total transferred:      22900 bytes
HTML transferred:       0 bytes
Requests per second:    49.55 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       20.182 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       20.182 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          22.16 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)
              min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:        9   10   0.3     10      11
Processing:     9   10   0.3     10      11
Waiting:        9   10   0.3     10      11
Total:         19   20   0.5     20      21

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
  50%     20
  66%     20
  75%     20
  80%     21
  90%     21
  95%     21
  98%     21
  99%     21
 100%     21 (longest request)

To summarise: On a 100+ mbit connection (as the above is), the average response time is 20ms. At home, however, I get an average of 130 ms (I have a 20/2 mbit connection). --Svip^talk 20:49, 4 March 2013 (CET)

w00t! It's so nice now! --Buddy (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2013 (CET)

It's faster than the Svip of light. Sanfazer (talk) 17:12, 5 March 2013 (CET).