Difference between revisions of "Talk:Audience scene"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '== As an appearance? == As you've probably noticed by now, a lot of articles are linking to ''Into the Wild Green Yonder'' about appearing in this scene. Usually, an appear...') |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Short story; treat this scene as an individual special episode. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | Short story; treat this scene as an individual special episode. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:So... what would this look like, sub bullet points for main film and this scene like we sometimes have for the filmisodes or...<br/>Would this imply that we need to treat other minor cameos or people hosings in a similar way? - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 11:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:50, 20 February 2010
As an appearance?
As you've probably noticed by now, a lot of articles are linking to Into the Wild Green Yonder about appearing in this scene. Usually, an appearance have a slight significance, even if it is just a cameo appearance or mention. Problem here, is that they just shoved as many characters as possible into one scene. So it less each appearances' significance. Therefore, I propose instead a special 'appearance' bulletin reserved for appearing in this scene, only. Even characters who, otherwise, appear in the film and then later in this scene, could have an additional appearance bulletin for that.
Short story; treat this scene as an individual special episode. --Sviptalk 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- So... what would this look like, sub bullet points for main film and this scene like we sometimes have for the filmisodes or...
Would this imply that we need to treat other minor cameos or people hosings in a similar way? - Quolnok 11:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)