Talk:Decapodians

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Revision as of 21:11, 21 August 2013 by Sanfazer (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Decapodians

The "Decapodians" article has been labelled the following levels:

This article appeared on the Main Page for August, 2006. This article (or a prior version) has been identified by the Infosphere community as one of the best.
This article is thoroughly developed.
No focus level has been assigned.

Buddy13 FW16.png I think we should take all the little bits about decapodian anatomy, and put them in their own section. Zoidberg has so many freakish traits, they should really be explored in detail. Like his fin, his gas bladder, his four hearts, his blowhole, is inkpouch, et cetera. The commentaries say that "Zoidberg is every sea creature" — they give him whatever trait is funny at the moment.

Whotmsig.jpg[Whaler on the Moon] You do that. And while you're at it, you could incorporate this picture of the Decapodian flag on the Mobile Oppression Palace. Perhaps it even can get it's own article?
Decapodian Flag.jpg

Life-Cycle Image[edit]

Buddy13 FW16.png Before I complete it, I'd like to ask a few questions: Where do you guys think the Vinnie form should go? I'm thinking after the coral form where siblings bud from them, but there's no real info. The order of Zoidberg's reverted forms are obvious, so it's just a matter of finding where to stick that snail form. On the other hand, we could just assume that Vinnie isn't a Decapodian, since he's not red and hasn't apparently aged since Zoidberg left. We could leave him off entirely, in this case. For now, I have plans to include the adult form (i.e., Zoidberg) and a "Mating Frenzy" phase. Should I include the Frenzy phase as an additional form? I'm also pondering whether to include hermit-crab form (from The Deep South), as it isn't really a developmental stage, and seems entirely optional to the Decapodians. Any suggestions?

Whotmsig.jpg[Whaler on the Moon] I'd leave Vinnie out - he's probably not Decapodian, but some crab bully from Zoidy's childhood. That would explain why he's still in the puddle. I'd leave out the hermit crab in Deep South, as it's not part of the life cycle.

What do you think? How's that? Buddy13 FW16.png

Whotmsig.jpg[Whaler on the Moon]I like it. Perhaps it should be said that the lifecycle shown is probably not complete and that there may well be even more forms. Great work!

It should also be stated that between the Cuttlefish stage and the mature stage, Decapodians become child-sized humanoids.--Gonzalo84 17:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Armpit thingies[edit]

Armpit things.png

I've been working on the anatomy part, including some things from more recent episodes (Lethal Inspection, The Prisoner of Benda), but I got stuck on these armpit things (pictured left). What are they? I know they occur on some marinal animals, and they resemble corals, but do they have a name and serve a purpose? Anyone know? Aki 13:16, 24 August 2010 (CEST)

They might not even be an actual part of him. Many sea creatures form symbiotic relationships with other organisms like coral or anemones. It's possible that these are some sort of creature that keeps food particles out of his armpits or something... --Buddy 20:32, 8 September 2010 (CEST)

Antarian Decapodians[edit]

That's my fault. Fan Futurama 15:14, 8 September 2010 (CEST)

What the H#LL does THIS mean?[edit]

"Decapodian culture shows the traits of being authoritarian and they seem to be strict beings, who do not welcome change to their society. Despite the authoritarian sense in the species' members, many of them are known to flock to other worlds, perhaps in search of a less strict society. It can be assumed that Decapodian society isn't strict in format, but essence of its authoritarianism is uncanny, and as a result the sense stems to its citizens."

What is trying to be said here? Trying and failing, mind you....--Bosda Di'Chi (talk) 20:42, 10 October 2012 (CEST)

I don't really see a problem with it. It uses a few big words, but if you use a dictionary, it's perfectly understandable. Kif (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2012 (CEST)