Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(What's New?)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:Buddy13/sig}} I'd love some feedback on the new look of it. It's obviously incomplete, but the major parts are working, so I thought it safe to migrate. Feel free to create the templates that are linked, but keep in mind they'll be included on the main page (so you can start with a level 3 or 4 heading, if you want (in fact, that's probably advisable for the what's new section)). Turns out editing the menu on the left is relatively simple, so that might get jiggled around a bit, maybe separating it into "navigation" and "resources" sections. And although I haven't tried it yet, it's also possible to add another section under the toolbox area. This might allow us to make navigation a bit more efficient. So, feedback on the main page and suggestions on what sort of links belong on the left column, please.
==New look?==
 
It seems that both the wikis that I look to for inspiration [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page] [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php/Main_Page] have changed the way their main pages are presented. Should we retain the old style, or alter our a bit? We don't need to copy them exactly, obviously (they're both different, anyway), but perhaps we could make a few changes? Suggestions welcome. [[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 20:35, 23 March 2006 (PST)
{{User:Whaler on the Moon/sig}} As I am just reviewing "Where No Fan Has Gone Before", I'd like to comment on the headline:
a) The full text is "Another classic science-fiction show cancelled before it's time."
b) Bender says it, not Fry.
 
{{User:Buddy13/sig}} As usual, I was recalling it from memory. It's now fixed, thanks.
 
== What's New? ==
 
{{User:Buddy13/sig}} How many days should it show? Five? Seven? Eighty-two?

Revision as of 05:35, 24 March 2006

New look?

It seems that both the wikis that I look to for inspiration [1] [2] have changed the way their main pages are presented. Should we retain the old style, or alter our a bit? We don't need to copy them exactly, obviously (they're both different, anyway), but perhaps we could make a few changes? Suggestions welcome. Buddy 20:35, 23 March 2006 (PST)