Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wallace and Gromit"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Deletion== Do we really need to have an article for everything referenced by ''Futurama''? I can understand articles for people mentioned directly (not including name puns) ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Deletion==
==Deletion==
Do we really need to have an article for everything referenced by ''Futurama''? I can understand articles for people mentioned directly (not including name puns) in ''Futurama'', but certainly not examples like this. We'd have articles for Jiffy Pop, C+C Music Factory and Hannah Montana if this was allowed. [[User:Roboto63|Motordome <small>(a.k.a. Roboto63)</small>]] 14:30, 4 March 2012 (CET)
Do we really need to have an article for everything referenced by ''Futurama''? I can understand articles for people mentioned directly (not including name puns) in ''Futurama'', but certainly not examples like this. We'd have articles for Jiffy Pop, C+C Music Factory and Hannah Montana if this was allowed. [[User:Roboto63|Motordome <small>(a.k.a. Roboto63)</small>]] 14:30, 4 March 2012 (CET)
:I concur.  We have Allusion sections on each episode article for this reason.  There are some allusions that are used either commonly or in such a way that it requires more than just mentioning it in a bullet point list.  Stuff such as ''[[Star Trek]]''. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 15:07, 4 March 2012 (CET)

Latest revision as of 16:07, 4 March 2012

Deletion

Do we really need to have an article for everything referenced by Futurama? I can understand articles for people mentioned directly (not including name puns) in Futurama, but certainly not examples like this. We'd have articles for Jiffy Pop, C+C Music Factory and Hannah Montana if this was allowed. Motordome (a.k.a. Roboto63) 14:30, 4 March 2012 (CET)

I concur. We have Allusion sections on each episode article for this reason. There are some allusions that are used either commonly or in such a way that it requires more than just mentioning it in a bullet point list. Stuff such as Star Trek. --Sviptalk 15:07, 4 March 2012 (CET)