Talk:Bender's Big Score Part 1

I'd say they might as well exist, they'll mostly be shells even when we know the plot from having watched the movies milions of times (still yet to see any of them myself). The "additional" sction of the infobox can probably include the movie. My old navbars had a spot for that. - Quolnok 15:43, 24 November 2007 (PST)
 * For that, I am still waiting for Buddy to get that ParserFunction extension installed so I can add that. With my final breath, I curse Buddy!!!  --SvipTalk 15:51, 24 November 2007 (PST)
 * Don't worry about it. I don't even like me. But yeah, see that other place I wrote something. I'll try to get a thing done. --Buddy 20:18, 24 November 2007 (PST)

Future Move
And since I think we agreed to create production code redirects, moving this in the future won't even cause a problem. Also, suggestion: Instead of "cut from the movie" perhaps "derived from the movie" is better, since we still don't know if they'll be adding or subtracting parts during the conversion to episodes. --Buddy 13:25, 25 November 2007 (PST)

The Story section
At some point these articles will probably have a "The Story" section, which would be identical to three of the acts of their films. What if instead of copying everything we just stick the content into templates to be used on both pages so that the coverage of the identical story remains identical? Something like or , this could result in Part 4 having acts 10,11,12 but we can just use some parser functions to change those if neccessary. - Quolnok 20:51, 9 March 2008 (PDT)
 * Why not use argument 1 as a boolean value whether or not it is a film, then it would know what acts to insert. Simple as that.  Also I prefer the  version. --SvipTalk 04:38, 10 March 2008 (PDT)
 * Yeah, that's sort of where I was headed with the parser. We'd probably use it to insert the section about "next/last time on Futurama" as well. - Quolnok 05:20, 10 March 2008 (PDT)