Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It's been a week. I trust there are no objections, so I'm putting it back in. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:19, 19 December 2010 (CET) | :It's been a week. I trust there are no objections, so I'm putting it back in. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:19, 19 December 2010 (CET) | ||
::Disputed canon reinstated. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:21, 19 December 2010 (CET) | ::Disputed canon reinstated. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:21, 19 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:::I don't see why anyone would disagree with you, Saber. Gunderson's is one of those things that just might pop up in the future and be proven a canon trademark. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 01:00, 20 December 2010 (CET) |
Revision as of 02:00, 20 December 2010
Template:Disputed canon
I think having this template in the article is important, as Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts may be non-canon, and thus not really exist in the Futurama universe. Anyone agree we should put it back in? Unit? San Saber 19:34, 12 December 2010 (CET)
- It's been a week. I trust there are no objections, so I'm putting it back in. San Saber 22:19, 19 December 2010 (CET)