|
|
| (111 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:Meta]] | | [[Category:Meta]] |
| {{conference table archive box}} | | {{conference table archive box}} |
| '''The Conference Table''' is for discussion of the Infosphere, and proposals for new ideas. For information about upcoming changes to the Infosphere, see [[Current events]]. | | This is the former page of the '''Conference Table''', please use [[Infosphere:Conference Table]] for creating new discussion. This is purely for history purposes. |
| __NEWSECTIONLINK__
| |
| [http://theinfosphere.org/index.php?title=Infosphere:Conference_Table&action=edit§ion=new Click here] to start a new discussion.
| |
|
| |
|
| If you feel a discussion needs to be archived, tag it with
| | ==Background Jokes== |
| :'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Discussion to be archived|discussion to be archived]]|current date ''or'' <nowiki>~~~~~}}</nowiki>''' (see template for more information) | | :''Move to [[Table:Background Jokes]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Got nothing to do? You can check out our [[I:TODO|To Do list]] to see if there is anything that need being done.
| | == Referencing other episodes. == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Referencing other episodes.]].'' |
|
| |
|
| i love Leela so much it hurts, Leela is a babe, i need more Leela. don't erase me anymore or i will erase you all. tpsens
| | == Image standards and choices == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Image standards and choices]].'' |
|
| |
|
| == Article introductions == | | == Levelling system == |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| | :''Move to [[Table:Levelling system]].'' |
| Several articles, especially episode articles, commentary, comics and the game articles don't have an introduction to what the article is about. It would be nice if we could have some introductions, even if it would just a bit of a repeat of what was in the infobox, e.g.;
| |
| :'''Space Pilot 3000''' is the first episode of [[Episode Listing#Season 1|season 1]] and was aired 28 March, 1999. | |
| Some articles may have longer introductions, if there is something special to mention, e.g. [[Futurama Returns]] was read aloud at Comic-Con. Indeed, that whole article only hints at it was read aloud, not really mentioned anywhere in the article. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:43, 5 July 2008 (CEST)
| |
| :Yup, that sounds fair enough. Especially for the longer ones. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 13:55, 5 July 2008 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
|
| | | == Types of characters; splitting secondary characters into 3 == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Types of characters; splitting secondary characters into 3]].'' |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| == Sarcastic laughter... == | |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| Yes, I searched the transcripts this time. I can't find it. I'm looking for the episode where Fry laughs sarcastically. And I can't remember what it was about, or I'd know the episode. Something is funny, but not, and Fry does that sarcastic "Hahahaha". Anyone know that one? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 15:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :[[Transcript:Future_Stock#line-56|Safety dance conversation]] with [[Steve Castle|That Guy]] in [[Future Stock]]? Can't think of any other options right now. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 17:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |
| ::Wait, I think I remembered... It was [[The Farnsworth Parabox]], when Leela 1 and Fry 1 were talking about their relationship. Leela 1 said something about one of here excuses and said it was funny... then Fry A said something like "Yeah, funny. Right Leela? HAHAHAHA!" ... At least, I think that's the one. Anyone know where I can view this ep (or at least the clip) online? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 17:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Maybe it was "[[I, Roommate]]", where Fry "laughs" along with Bender when Leela have convinced him to move out. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::No, it was definitely the Parabox. I don't know how to link to specific lines like you guys do, or I'd show you. Just go to the transcript and Ctrl+F for "Funny"... I think there's a couple uses of the word, but you'll find it. Now I just need a clip. Is Futurama on Hulu? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Hmm, seems to be quite a few clips there, but not the one I want. Anyone tell me how to make my own clips? Everyone else seems to be able to do it... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avidemux Avidemux] is a brilliant application to cut out specific clips of video streams. It is pretty simple and straight forward. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 22:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == New CSS launched! ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| We are proud to present our new redesign of our wiki, and we hope you will enjoy it as much as we will. However, should some parts of the old design still remain in the new look, we encourage you to report them here. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :But the history [http://theinfosphere.org/index.php?title=Philip_J._Fry&curid=1336&diff=38828&oldid=37633&rcid=38801] it is still unreadable! - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 05:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Nevermind, fixed it myself. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 05:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::In Firefox the file upload dialogue can't be styled. We need to do something about it because it currently is shown in the standard style, with the only change being white text. Therefore the entered text isn't visible [http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/81683] [http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/inputfile.html]. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 07:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Inline episode/film/comic references == | | == Inline episode/film/comic references == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Inline episode/film/comic references]].'' |
| I think I have brought this up before, but I am going to do it again, cause apparently I did not make myself clear the previous time. Whenever mentioning an episode, film or reference within a context, can we please not use the {{templink|elink}}, {{templink|flink}} and {{templink|clink}} templates? I still urge you to use them in appearances lists, infoboxes, overviews, among other things. But the whole line of brackets and icons doesn't really go well inline.
| |
| | |
| Therefore, I am recommending, that when mentioning an episode or comic, put it in quotation marks like this; "[[Space Pilot 3000]]" or "[[Monkey Sea, Monkey Doom!]]". It should be apparent by the context that we are speaking of an episode and/or comic. If you really which to distinguish yourself between the two, use phrases like '''in the episode "[[Space Pilot 3000]]"''' or '''in the comic "[[Monkey Sea, Monkey Doom!]]"'''.
| |
| | |
| As for films, keep them just italic, e.g. ''[[Bender's Big Score]]''. The reason? Simply because it looks better inline. If you are not convinced, try using the differences inline sometime. ''But'', don't write links to episodes/comics without the quotations or films without the italics, unless you are mentioning them in "vague" format, e.g. "in the [[Space Pilot 3000|first episode]]". --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :hehe. whoops, shall do from now on--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 20:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ::Also, the icons should be changed to some hue of cyan to match the new colour scheme a little better. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Done. See [[All My Circuits#Appearances]] for an example. If they still appear in red, do a refresh. Your browser is caching! --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == ''Bender's Big Score'' on UMD? == | | == ''Bender's Big Score'' on UMD? == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Bender's Big Score on UMD?]].'' |
| I just obtained a link to an Amazon page for [http://www.amazon.co.uk/Futurama-Benders-Big-Score-Mini/dp/B001KTRFSK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1237147929&sr=8-1 ''Bender's Big Score'' on UMD] (for those not in the know, UMD is the format the PSP uses), which have apparently been released (at least they claim to have 3 new or used copies in stock). This made me think of the fact that [[Volume One]] was released on VHS and VCD. However, we never mention these "lesser" known media. So the real issue is, should we make room for "other media"? Obviously keeping [[DVD]] in focus. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 20:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Another terrible Sony-proprietary format! Why do people support these?! --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 04:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Hey, Blu Ray isn't proprietary (or bad, just slightly unneeded). UMD on the other hand - I have five discs, all games, for PSP. This is the only place anyone will ever get to use the discs making them very niche. Nonetheless, I might be tempted to pick up an ItWGY UMD if it comes out here for cheap.<br/><br/>Oh, and yes these most definitely deserve a mention. Our merchandise section is very incomplete. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 11:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I didn't say it was "bad", I just hate Sony and I'll never buy anything with the "Sony" label on it. And yes, other companies can make players now, but with sony technology, of which Sony still gets a portion of the money. Bleh. Stupid Sony. But I'm done ranting now. You know how some people have an irrational hatred of Ford or Pepsi or Microsoft? I'm that way with Sony. The end. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Characters in the sidebar? ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| Okay, this one is pretty simple, I am just thinking that it might be a good idea to have a link to a list of characters, perhaps just [[:Category:Characters]], if anything. I think [[list of characters]] redirects there, anyway. So pretty much just whether it should be before episodes or after. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Go with after Episodes (and subitems) - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 10:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == I:I, captains ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| I've been trying to get into it various times, but it just doesn't work: [[I:I]]. Either it's my computer or something's wrong. Can anyone shed some light on it? [[User:Chris of the Futurama2|Chris of the Futurama2]] 19:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Apparently the huge amount of examples tore the server a new one. So, I stripped the documentations of examples. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 19:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Well, at least it's fixed. Thanks. [[User:Chris of the Futurama2|Chris of the Futurama2]] 19:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == "You heard him! Pay the man!" ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| Anyone know what episode was thst from? It's been driving me nuts, because I think that was a case that had just finished. I thought it was from [[Time Keeps on Slippin']], but I couldn't find it in the transcripts. It went something like this: <br>
| |
| | |
| '''Bender:''' ''(To Leela)'' You heard him! Pay the man! <br>
| |
| '''One of the robot hookers:''' Bender, honey, we love you! <br>
| |
| '''Bender:''' You know it! <br>
| |
| | |
| Anyone? [[User:Chris of the Futurama2|Chris of the Futurama2]] 20:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :It's from "[[Put Your Head on My Shoulder]]": [[Transcript:Put Your Head on My Shoulder#line-121|line 121]]. Remember, our [[Infosphere:Searching|guide to search]], also provide a [http://www.google.com/custom?sa=Google+Search&domains=theinfosphere.org/Transcript:&sitesearch=theinfosphere.org/Transcript: Google link for searching our templates]. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 20:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Also, it's funnier than that, because Bender actually says "Shut up, baby, I know it!" — Comedy gold! --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I know! {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}} 23:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Fan related... stuff ==
| |
| | |
| On the Internets, there are several ''[[Futurama]]'' related stuff. Or rather, people talking about it. Our wiki is about the show, but can't we have articles about stuff that is also about ''Futurama''? I mean, why do we not have a PEEL article? Or something about the Futurama Madhouse? Hell, we could even have an article about ourselves. Wikipedia has that. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 22:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Figure a good way to do it, and I don't see why not. Maybe its own namespace? Or just category... We already have merchandise, which is not strictly ''about'' the show. Might as well have notes about sites, and even have fancy wikipedia charts comparing the contents of fansites (like, this one has wallpapers, that one has audio clips, etc.). I recommend moving [[The Infosphere]] to [[Infosphere]] (I mean, we don't have [[Brainspawn|''the'' Brainspawn]], or [[Hypnotoad|''the'' Hypnotoad]], do we? Then, create the [[The Infosphere]] article about [[The Infosphere]] in the place where [[Infosphere]] used to be. I seem to have gotten a little [[Angry Norwegian|carried away]]... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 05:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Perhaps, but I think it would be wiser if [[Infosphere]] or [[The Infosphere]] were either disambigious pages, as to link to each article, sort of like the [[Joe]] article. The issue is, should it then be [[Infosphere (memory bank)]] or [[The Infosphere]]? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::I'm good with it the way it is now, with [[Infosphere]] going to the in-universe article, and the parenthetical [[Infosphere (website)]] leading to the other one. It's better that we give priority to in-universe things. So, unless there isn't a good reason not to change it, I don't see why it couldn't stay the same. Quadruple negative! --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 04:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Indeed. I think right now we have the following priority list:
| |
| ::::Primary characters > Episodes > Comics > Secondary/Tertiary characters > Items/places/etc. > Merchandise/Fan stuff > Other
| |
| :::Whatever Other could be, I don't know. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Needing Image Template == | | == Needing Image Template == |
| I've noticed that many pages don't have a lead image. If we create a "needs image" template (using the 'Awaitong Screenie.jpg' image) then it might become clear which pages need images and we would be able to upload one for them.--<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight:bold;"> '''[[User:Neutral President|Neutral President]]''' </span> [ [[User:Neutral President|U]] | [[User_talk:Neutral President|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/Neutral President|C]] ]''' - <span style="color:black;">I have no strong feelings one way or the other. </span> 00:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
| | :''Move to [[Table:Needing Image Template]].'' |
| :I suppose, though I feel the number is not as high as you claim. And it is basically a notice for editors, and I think most of our editors realise it. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 01:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Most of the articles have [[:Image:AwaitingScreenie.jpg]] and [[:Image:No Character Image.png]] in place of the images, and they only link to [[:Image:AwaitingScreenie.jpg#Links|these]] and [[:Image:No Character Image.png#Links|images]], although, there are ''some'' others like [[:Category:Trials|Trials]] that have no images. {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}} 01:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| If I didn't already mention this very thing somewhere, I was totally thinking it last week. I was going to start taking screenshots of needed stuff, and then noticed that the practice of putting the placeholder image up has fallen out of... well, practice. It's much easier to go on a screenshot-spree when there's a handy list of images that are needed, and it's also easier to put the image on the page, what with these fancy new templates everywhere, when there's a simple placeholder to replace. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 05:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I know I still throw it on articles I can't be bothered capping. Yes we should still have this in use to find the pages without images. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 06:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::This had me thinking though, I was considering making my bot swoop around articles and detect most likely articles to lack images (which would be articles with infoboxes, but without an image). In addition, since our 'do not crop images for character' policy, it could also swoop around images and detect whether they have been cropped (simply by taking their resolution and calculating whether it is within a usual 4:3 or 16:9 format), in addition, I think a category for 'character images' would soon be in order. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Anything that would make it easier for someone to mass-upload needed screenshots would please me. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 04:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Trial infobox ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| I tried to do an infobox for TV shows (like ''[[Futurama]]'' and [[All My Circuits]]), and it didn't go well since I did it in the playground, but I think it'd be better to do an infobox on trials, but I don't know how to do it. I'll show you my example and maybe someone will make it?
| |
| Here: <br>
| |
| | |
| <pre>{{trial infobox
| |
| |name = Name of the trial
| |
| |image = An image of the trial
| |
| |image text = (optional) Some text describing the trial
| |
| |year = Year of trial
| |
| |location = Location of trial
| |
| |judge(s) = Who the judge(s) was/were in the trial
| |
| |charged = What the accused was charged for
| |
| |result = Guilty or not guilty (if guilty, what the accused was sentenced to)
| |
| |appearance = In which the episode/film it appeared
| |
| }}</pre>{{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| | |
| :I suppose, there are actually quite a bit of trial articles anyway. I mean, even the [[game]] has its own infobox! Let me get on it... --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 23:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Cool. {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| :::Done: {{templink|trial infobox}} --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 23:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Cool. Now just to put them in. {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == Donations for new server == | | == Donations for new server == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Donations for new server]].'' |
| Our current host is great. Don't get me wrong. And we are not paying a penny for it, so it's like Wikia without the ads (and all the other crap). But there is one hitch, it's run by one guy, and that guy is not me. Occasionally, some of his actions would lay the webserver down and it just needs to be rebooted. And rebooting it is snappy, like that. Only problem is; I cannot reboot it, and he isn't always there. Which is why it was down once for 12 hours at least.
| |
| | |
| And that's not good. Therefore I am suggesting we purchase our own dedicated virtual machine (same setup as now), but our own, with no other things running and just this website. My friend would also prefer it this way, because his other stuff isn't critical to be up 24/7, ours is.
| |
| | |
| So that's the idea (I'll give you the details on the server when I can finally obtain them). But here's the hitch; servers costs money, and I do not have the currency, therefore I am suggestion we made a call for donations in the [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice|sitenotice]], like Wikipedia does from time to time. I shall look into what at least one year of this setup will cost, and then ask our readers and contributors for it. It is of course not required to donate, but it would certainly be appreciated.
| |
| | |
| In addition, I think we should ask for the same curtsey that Wikipedia grants its donators; the ability to be listed (if they want to). But that is more of beauty thing. I'll keep you posted, once I get the details on the server, I will prepare the sitenotice. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 11:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :If we must, we must. We certainly wouldn't be the only wiki doing this. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 12:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Might also want to put out a call to the other Nerdlingers at PEEL and other fansites. As someone who paid out of my own pocket for the first few years of this site's life, and had a donation link on the bottom since the beginning, I don't hold out much hope. You wanna know how much was actually donated to the server costs of the site? Zero. And lots of it. I am torn as to whether or not I would donate, being so spurned previously. It's like, nobody ever did it for me, so why should I? But on the other hand, if it means the difference between life and death for my precious Infosphere, I guess I must... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 01:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::If it makes it any better, you are donating to me. And didn't I donate a lot of my effort for this wiki? --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 01:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Time is money. So sure. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 23:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Do we get one of those cool money-thermometers? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 23:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::I was think we should! Though, it'll probably be a "manual" setting. But let's see what I brew up. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 23:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Donations: break ===
| |
| I have set up our [[Infosphere:Donation campaign|donation campaign]], as well as a site notice, which you have hopefully noticed by now. If you have any suggestions to change of the language, either do it yourself or tell me. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 17:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Season 6 (hypothetically) ==
| |
| | |
| Call me sentimental, call me what you want, but hear me out. The [[Future of Futurama]] is at stakes during these weeks. A question on everyone's lips; why is it taking so long to come to a decision? I mean, yes or no already! This Saturday, the 28th, it will be 10 years ago "[[Space Pilot 3000]]" aired for the first time. And I find it difficult to believe that [[Matt Groening]] or [[David X. Cohen]] have not mentioned this to the people at FOX. Indeed, it is more likely than not for them to have recommended announcing [[season 6]] on this specific day, and keep the standard reply "it's in talks" until then.
| |
| | |
| Of course; I can be entirely wrong. But that's beside the point when it is announced. If season 6 ''does'' come, it will be important for the Infosphere to manage. Interest for ''Futurama'' will grow - undoubtedly - and therefore this can be our "claim to fame", so our updates need to be snappy and en par with the news.
| |
| | |
| While Wikia's Futurama Wiki cannot be considered a "serious" alternative in my eyes, it still ranks better on Google, and therefore it gets higher props. Luckily, however, Wikipedia is willing to link to our wiki rather than theirs, and that is our card (e.g. try googling for 'my three suns', an article we have been linked from Wikipedia for quite a while, we are just below Wikipedia).
| |
| | |
| But this it not about beating Wikia, this is about pleasing the fanbase, the casual fans and the rest. If our information is not more snappy than Wikipedia's, they may not have reason to seek to our articles. So, here's to hoping. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == moving "the" ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| whatever has "the" at the start i'm moving to a name without "the". ok?--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 01:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :There are certain articles that should not be moved, such as articles of things that has "The" in the name, such as "[[The Farnsworth Parabox]]". --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 02:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::i took that into account. i think i'm done doing them all--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 02:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == New Server! ==
| |
| | |
| You know, scrap what I said about donations (though, I wouldn't mind some). I went ahead and purchased the server, I am right now in the mist of configuring so it will ready to transfer from this server to the other. When exactly it will be up and running remains sketchy, since I need to get certain things working to keep the speed and whatnot of our current setup. However, I presume it should be fast, and could be ready before the week is out.
| |
| | |
| I'll keep you posted. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 23:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Wow, cool. Where's it located? When you say "purchased" you mean like, for really? Or is it an annual thing? I'd feel bad not donating at least something. Slap together one of those Wikipedia money-mometers and we can have a funds-drive! --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 00:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :We might just do that anyway. It is located on hexonet in Germany, and it is somewhat an "annual" thing, since it has a monthly fee. But I have complete control over it as if it were my own machine. I will keep you posted. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Cool, not too expensive right? This should be a nice change. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 13:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| As promised, here are some details about the server.
| |
| ;Cost
| |
| :28 EUR per month
| |
| ;CPU
| |
| :1500MHz
| |
| ;HD
| |
| :45GB
| |
| ;Traffic (monthly)
| |
| :1000GB
| |
| ;RAM
| |
| :1024MB (can be extended to 1536MB)
| |
| | |
| Since it is a Virtual Machine, there is no creation fee. So all there is to pay is 28 Euros per month. But then we ought to give the site a run for its money! --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 13:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Your €28.00 is equal to my $37.70 (as of today's conversion rate). --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Pink Koala ==
| |
| | |
| I don't want to be a total asshat here. But look at that [[User:Pink Koala|user page]]. It's like they just copy/paste a bunch of pointless crap and don't even worry about formatting (half of it renders as malformed code!). I know a user page is supposed to be personal, but... I don't know, it's like they're using it as a myspace page with quizzes and email forwards and stupid crap like that. I feel like just deleting it now, but I wanna know what everyone else thinks. I've left several warnings on the talk page, but they're ignored. I also feel like, if it comes back after removal, a user ban is in order. From what I can tell, the user's actual contributions have been negligible anyway... Thoughts? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Hm, well, a ban would be a bit too much, I say; we empty the page if no reactions are made or any fix are done by the member itself, within a fairly reasonable amount of time. If the member continues to pursue its content, we can then ban them. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 22:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::fair enough, its pisses me off too. clear the page. seems to be the only thing they edit these days...--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 20:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::I'd say it's fair, so long as we ask them about it first. Also, don't go straight to a permanent ban. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 08:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Oh, Buttocks ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| Not only was the titles changed because of the server mishap, but some pics have been altered, like [http://futurama.overt-ops.com/index.php?title=Special:Unusedimages&limit=500&offset=0 those unused files], and "[[Channel √2 News]]" pics. Maybe we should, like, keep track of the altered artticles or something, so we can tell what pics and stuff have been altered. <br> {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| :Yeah, unfortunately, all articles with special characters in their title have had this issue, the simple task is just to move them, so report them as they come. However, pictures cannot be moved, so the recommended version is to reupload them on the new name. And if you can just use the former images, that would be fine. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 01:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Well, I just checked the "All pages" page, and it seems that are there only:
| |
| [[7¹¹]] <br>
| |
| [[7¹¹ Clerk]] <br>
| |
| [[Bender Bending RodrÃÂguez]] <br>
| |
| [[Bender Bending RodrÃÂguez]] <br>
| |
| [[Channel √2 News]] <br>
| |
| [[Worms of Colón]] <br>
| |
| [[ÃŽÂ kea Robot]] <br>
| |
| [[î kea Robot]] <br>
| |
| Could be more. {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == Star Trek category? ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| we do seem to have a lot of Star Trek articles, and they keep growing by the week. It would be easier, as i am making the [[Star Trek connections]] page, that we have somewhere i (and everyone else) can access all of the articles. i'll make it now. suggestions?--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 20:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I was thinking the same thing -- I'm on it. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 21:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::if there are any more, you can put them in, but i think that's it--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 21:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Do tinfoil hats really work? ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|12 April, 2009}}
| |
| | |
| [http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2009/04/weekend_diversion_do_tinfoil_h.php heh]. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 00:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Main Page suggestions == | | == Main Page suggestions == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Main Page suggestions]].'' |
| it looks great though, but i think i we had some things like "featured image of the fortnight", a "did-you-know" section or "user of the month". i think if these got up and running and people nominated for then and stuff it would be really cool. the "index" should also be updated with more characters and stuff--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 09:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Seeing as there are five or six active members, the "Member of the month" thing would last half a year at best. But I do like the "Did you know?" thing. We could put little tidbits of trivia in there, of course with links to full articles. In fact, what might be even better is a JS cycling thing that's random every time you load the page. We could probably create a hundred or so of them... --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::fair enough about the user of the month, but if someone could get the did you know up and running, i'd help with it. how about image of the fortnight?--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 22:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == We're on Wikipedia! ==
| |
| | |
| Nothing much, but apparently we have an article on Wikipedia now: {{w|The Infosphere}}. Currently its content is mostly copied from our own article, [[The Infosphere (website)]], but then again, now Buddy13 is mentioned in a Wikipedia article.
| |
| | |
| And it hasn't been scheduled for deletion, hm hm. I even took the liberty of creating a template to link to our wiki in a swoop from ''Futurama'' related articles on Wikipedia: {{w|Template:Infosphere}}. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Now I feel bad for not fixing up the text. Had I known that it would be copied to Wikipedia, I'd've been on it like white on me. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 17:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Now you got two articles to fix. In the words of Fry; 'fix it, fix it, fix it, fix it, fix it'! --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 17:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| '''Surprise!!!''' It was I! I was waiting if anyone would notice. Sorry for the copying of work. I'm crappy at making articles. <br> {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == IP edits ==
| |
| {{discussion to be archived|19 April, 2009}}
| |
| I am bringing this up once more, as I fear we may again be loosing potentially good edits from visitors who just wish to apply a quick edit to our wiki.
| |
| | |
| Obviously, we should, as before, take some measurements against potentially bad edits, while most of them will be easily disregarded by the software anyway, I feel a the bot may be able to keep an eye on the recent changes now and then. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :yeah i think average people should be able to edit the wiki, we can always handles trolls and whatnot.--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 21:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| How are we going to do it? CAPTCHA's, or a bot that reverts any massively significant change (e.g., blanking or replacing with spam)? Or maybe just require CAPTCHA as an additional step for a large edit, but let smaller edits go by? Is that last one possible, cuz that would be great. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 02:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Ironically, that is how the CAPTCHA extension we previously had worked. Whenever an edit were big, added many external links, created a new page and stuff like that, a CAPTCHA would be asked for the user. But for the common minor edits, no CAPTCHA was initiated. When I get around to this, I am going to look into upgrading the software as well as all of the extensions. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 09:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Yep, open it up again and hopefully they'll behave themselves this time. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 11:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| I have opened for IP edits. In addition, we are now running on 1.14.0 and I upgraded the extensions as well. Let's see what happens. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 14:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Notability == | | == Notability == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Notability]].'' |
| Wikipedia has a notability requirement, but as a rule, we shouldn't. The problem is... I can sense that there is a certain limit on notability that please like [[starwars:|Wookiepedia]] and [[startrek:|Memory Alpha]] does not have. I mean, think about it, [[Coolio]] was a guest star on ''Futurama'' twice... surely he deserves an article, albeit short, but he is certainly worth it.
| |
| | |
| And for that reason, I think we should go back to the deep down simplified; "if it is related to official ''Futurama'' work, then there can be an article". --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :This has been my belief from the beginning. Minutiae is our bread and butter here. The whole point is to be as detailed as possible about anything and everything [[Futurama]]. I figure that, as we write articles, just about every noun (especially Proper Nouns) (and even some verbs) should be a link. Eventually there will be enough to fill up the "Wanted Pages" list, and we start creating them. In fact, when I first started, the Wanted Pages list was my main way of choosing what pages to work on next. A lot of these minor articles are going to be stubs at first, but surely we can fill them in (alternatively, we could just classify them as "minor" and forgo the "stub" markings. I mean, if we've written all there is and it's still short, what more can we do? --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 02:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Stubs and minor articles are in my book two different things. A stub is an article that could possibly be longer. A minor article is an article that may not be able to be much longer. But this is also a reason I proposed the redirect rule, cause most of the stuff we could (and should) have articles about. But even guest stars needs an article.
| |
| ::Imagine this; a reader wants to know what it was Coolio did on the show, cause he knows Coolio did something, but not entirely sure what, then bam! There is an article, and everything is clear. It works for mostly any subject Futurama touches. Just like the [[French]] article, sure we mention French when it is appropriate in articles, but what if you wanted an overview from the "French perspective"? Well, now you can. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 09:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Originally if it was very small we attempted to put it in a shared article, but there was only a hundred-odd articles back then and we still hadn't completed the episodes. I'm still fairly sure we should avoid fanfics/fanart but everything else can have a place. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 12:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::This is why I specified the statement, "if it is related to '''official''' ''Futurama'' work, it can have an article". That includes episodes, comics, the game, merchandise and other work by people officially recognised by ''Futurama''. The last may require individual consideration. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 12:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Reception and production == | | == Reception and production == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Reception and production]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Two things. I realise we have a [[production]] article, but we do not have sections on production in episode articles or film articles where it may be appropriate to have some discussion about the production of a film or episode. This section should most serve as its own section, rather than being inside Additional Info.
| | == Animatics == |
| | | :''Move to [[Table:Animatics]].'' |
| In addition, what we do not have is a 'reception' section, something Wikipedia has, this would give the readers a view about the average reception of an episode, film or comic. If a section gets big enough, it may be preferable to move it out of the Additional Info and into its own section. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 20:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| :I love the idea of having "reception" on each episode. It'd be great to call out what things were great and what things didn't quite work. And what the hell is wrong with "[[That's Lobstertainment!]]". I mean, I can't stand that episode, but it's got some of the funniest Bender moments ever. I can't figure out why I don't like it. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 02:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| | == Something I'ma work on. == |
| ::Hey, why not? So long as it doesn't turn into purely whoever wrote the section's personal opinion, it'll make a good addition. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 12:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| | :''Move to [[Table:Something I'ma work on.]].'' |
|
| |
|
| ==Star Wars== | | == I demand more connections! == |
| {{discussion to be archived|19 April, 2009}}
| | :''Move to [[Table:I demand more connections!]].'' |
| agin i will make another category, except this time for ''[[Star Wars]]''. and off i go!--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 21:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==two things== | | == Categories for voice actors? == |
| {{discussion to be archived|19 April, 2009}}
| | :''Move to [[Table:Categories for voice actors?]].'' |
| why do ''[[Star Trek]]'', ''[[Star Wars]]'' and ''[[Simpsons]]'' all have to have "Connections" after their name? it looks stupid and i think it would be better if they were just called by their name minus the "connections".
| |
|
| |
|
| and also the external links are green now. i don't really like that, its better as orange or whatever it was before.--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 01:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
| | == Calling all Nerdlingers! == |
| :Hm, as for the first thing, I have to agree, I was thinking the same thing. But mainly the article are about connections, so many a slight rephrasing in the introduction would make it work. | | :''Move to [[Table:Calling all Nerdlingers!]].'' |
| :As for the new colour for the external links, it was because I wanted the links to be obvious that they were not like the other links. But I cannot settle on a colour. :( --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 01:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Funny, I have orange still, with a green arrow thing. {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| :::Actually, I like the greenish yellow. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 11:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Oh, it was my monobook. I, too, like the green links, and the green boxes on the templates. Nice touch. <br> {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == Do you have the time? == | | == Oh yes, I forgot... == |
| {{discussion to be archived|19 April, 2009}}
| | :''Move to [[Table:Oh yes, I forgot...]].'' |
|
| |
|
| I'm sorry, I know I'll seem, too, like a noob, but when it's 08:00 Eastern Daylight Time for me, it's 00:00 here. What does it use? <br> {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| | == Infosphere:Portal == |
| :Well, when most of us sign our name the time that appears is in [[wikipedia:UTC|UTC]], but has previously had other time zones based on where the server was located. The time zone in the recent changes can be set through your [[Special:preferences|preferences]] page, which reminds me I need to reset that one of mine to/from daylight savings. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 10:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | | :''Move to [[Table:Infosphere:Portal]].'' |
|
| |
|
| == Animatics == | | == Chinese Infosphere - coming up == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Chinese Infosphere - coming up]].'' |
|
| |
|
| It is a well established fact that there exists [[animatic]]s for ''Futurama'', yet we have no real articles on this subject. I propose we create yet another namespace, "Animatic:" for episodes with animatics.
| | == Linking to Redirects == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Linking to Redirects]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Since not every episode has it, or rather, very few does, I propose that we omit the navigations, and just have a complete list in the infobox. {{templink|episode infobox}} will also get a new parameter called "hasanimatic", which is simply a boolean value.
| | == Pixelations == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Pixelations]].'' |
|
| |
|
| Speaking of the episode infobox, I also propose that we add a "hasnocommentary" parameter, since I am not sure [[Volume Five]] will include new commentaries, if every released.
| | == Season 6 is fact == |
| | :''Move to [[Table:Season 6 is fact]].'' |
|
| |
|
| And of course, I shall introduce a {{templink|cite animatic}} template for citing animatics. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 12:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
| | == More Categories == |
| :This falls into the "official Futurama productions" category, so yes we can have something for them. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 13:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| | :''Moved to [[Table:More Categories]]''. |
| ::I'll get around to doing [[Hell is Other Robots]] animatic as I think i'm the only one with that dvd. i'll wait until some of the other ones are finished--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 23:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::And I can do [[Bender's Game Part 1]] animatic. Hey--why isn't there the films in the infobox? <br> {{User:Chris of the Futurama2/sig}}
| |
| ::::Most likely because while there are animatics for the part ones of BWaBB, BG and ItWGY, he's secretly planing to do a section for storyboards and the boxes label these three as "storyboard animatics". I think they are closer to animatic than storyboard, however. Oh, and as they are for the episodes rather than the films, these will be linked to from the episode articles infobox and the disc features section, but not the film infobox. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 05:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==WTF?== | | == Forum style for the Conference Table? == |
| sometimes when i click on a link this message pops up:
| | :''Moved to [[Table:Forum style for the Conference Table?]]''. |
| :"Fejl: Serveren stak mig i ryggen og skred. 0"
| |
| what is that?!?!?!--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 23:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :here is a screenshot of it [http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/962/68180559.jpg]. it does nothing at all, it just pops up and you press okay and everything is fine. i just don't get it!--[[User:Scruffy|My leg feels funny!]] 00:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Well, Svip handles the server, so the error (which should probably not be seen publicly) is in Danish. "Error: Server stuck me in the back and slide. 0", clearly a direct translation is not the way to go, not via google anyway. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 06:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Oh man, it is part of a script I wrote some time ago, which usually works. The message was originally for debugging, and the number at the end should be the interesting part. Anyway, I have removed it from the Common.js file now, so you should be able to cache refresh a fresh script.
| |
| :::And for the record, the message means "Error: The server stabbed me in the back and fled." --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 08:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
