Difference between revisions of "Infosphere talk:Spoilers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I'm sorry, but a man who is watching Futurama could haven't seen Star Wars and this sentence is a Star Wars spoiler, which is worse on a Futurama wiki. We can speak about spoiler...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm sorry, but a man who is watching Futurama could haven't seen Star Wars and this sentence is a Star Wars spoiler, which is worse on a Futurama wiki. | I'm sorry, but a man who is watching Futurama could haven't seen Star Wars and this sentence is a Star Wars spoiler, which is worse on a Futurama wiki. | ||
We can speak about spoilers without revealing spoilers of others series. --[[Special:Contributions/90.5.205.110|90.5.205.110]] 14:39, 22 September 2010 (CEST) | We can speak about spoilers without revealing spoilers of others series. --[[Special:Contributions/90.5.205.110|90.5.205.110]] 14:39, 22 September 2010 (CEST) | ||
:Haha, that makes quite a lot of sense. I just figured it something everyone knew by now, but ofcourse we can't assume that. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 15:33, 22 September 2010 (CEST) | |||
::Indeed, I was sorted of weirded out by the fact that the article had to provide an example. Hey, why don't you just link to [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Spoilers Uncyclopedia's article on spoilers] (warning: contains '''a lot''' of spoilers)? ---'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|talk]]</sup> 16:09, 22 September 2010 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 22 September 2010
I'm sorry, but a man who is watching Futurama could haven't seen Star Wars and this sentence is a Star Wars spoiler, which is worse on a Futurama wiki. We can speak about spoilers without revealing spoilers of others series. --90.5.205.110 14:39, 22 September 2010 (CEST)
- Haha, that makes quite a lot of sense. I just figured it something everyone knew by now, but ofcourse we can't assume that. Aki 15:33, 22 September 2010 (CEST)
- Indeed, I was sorted of weirded out by the fact that the article had to provide an example. Hey, why don't you just link to Uncyclopedia's article on spoilers (warning: contains a lot of spoilers)? ---Sviptalk 16:09, 22 September 2010 (CEST)