Table:Forum style for the Conference Table?

Conference Table

Discussion

Having topics like this can be difficult to keep track of, so I am thinking we should use a forum like approach as on Memory Alpha and Wookiepedia. I can easily implement it. I believe I will turn the current threads into threads. I just need the go. --Svip^Talk 19:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I've always thought it would be a better format, I just didn't think it was an option without setting up a separate forum... --Buddy 20:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

This is why they write extensions for MediaWiki. :D --Svip^Talk 20:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

There! Did it. How it looks? --Svip^Talk 21:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Ooh, fancy. It's like a hybrid of Wiki and Forum formats. Me likey. --Buddy 21:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

seconded over here! --I'm Scruffy... the Janitor. 21:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Am I the only one that thinks it's funny that Scruffy just seconded? Cuz it is. --Buddy 21:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Can i second that aswell? --I'm Scruffy... the Janitor. 21:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Humbug, I say, humbug! Seriously though, are we putting back in the rest of the current discussions? And what's this about not needing to archive things any more? - Quolnok 11:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, seems these topics were created out of order, so some of the newer discussions aren't in the top ten. Perhaps it might need to be a little longer, also is there a paging option for older items? - Quolnok 11:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I tried to do it in much order as possible, but some may have screwed up. However, I assure you, that in future use of this method, the discussions will become a lot more clear and obvious. Right now, it may not be as obvious. --Svip^Talk 11:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)