Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think having this template in the article is important, as ''Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts'' may be non-canon, and thus not really exist in the ''Futurama'' universe. Anyone agree we should put it back in? [[User:Unit 3.0|Unit]]? [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 19:34, 12 December 2010 (CET) | I think having this template in the article is important, as ''Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts'' may be non-canon, and thus not really exist in the ''Futurama'' universe. Anyone agree we should put it back in? [[User:Unit 3.0|Unit]]? [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 19:34, 12 December 2010 (CET) | ||
:It's been a week. I trust there are no objections, so I'm putting it back in. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:19, 19 December 2010 (CET) | :It's been a week. I trust there are no objections, so I'm putting it back in. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:19, 19 December 2010 (CET) | ||
::Disputed canon reinstated. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:21, 19 December 2010 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 23:21, 19 December 2010
Template:Disputed canon
I think having this template in the article is important, as Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts may be non-canon, and thus not really exist in the Futurama universe. Anyone agree we should put it back in? Unit? San Saber 19:34, 12 December 2010 (CET)