Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
::Disputed canon reinstated. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:21, 19 December 2010 (CET)
::Disputed canon reinstated. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 22:21, 19 December 2010 (CET)
:::I don't see why anyone would disagree with you, Saber. Gunderson's is one of those things that just might pop up in the future and be proven a canon trademark. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 01:00, 20 December 2010 (CET)
:::I don't see why anyone would disagree with you, Saber. Gunderson's is one of those things that just might pop up in the future and be proven a canon trademark. [[User:Aki|Aki]] 01:00, 20 December 2010 (CET)
::::I didn't start the discussion just because I wanted to know what everybody thought. I knew the template should be there, so I would've put it in myself, right away. But [[User:Unit 3.0|Unit 3.0]] had removed it, so I preferred to find out why before undoing his edit. Maybe he's on vacation or something... (If Gunderson's reappears later, we'll still be using the template, but only when referring to [[6ACV13]], right?) [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 13:33, 20 December 2010 (CET)

Revision as of 14:33, 20 December 2010

Template:Disputed canon

I think having this template in the article is important, as Gunderson's Unshelled Nuts may be non-canon, and thus not really exist in the Futurama universe. Anyone agree we should put it back in? Unit? San Saber 19:34, 12 December 2010 (CET)

It's been a week. I trust there are no objections, so I'm putting it back in. San Saber 22:19, 19 December 2010 (CET)
Disputed canon reinstated. San Saber 22:21, 19 December 2010 (CET)
I don't see why anyone would disagree with you, Saber. Gunderson's is one of those things that just might pop up in the future and be proven a canon trademark. Aki 01:00, 20 December 2010 (CET)
I didn't start the discussion just because I wanted to know what everybody thought. I knew the template should be there, so I would've put it in myself, right away. But Unit 3.0 had removed it, so I preferred to find out why before undoing his edit. Maybe he's on vacation or something... (If Gunderson's reappears later, we'll still be using the template, but only when referring to 6ACV13, right?) San Saber 13:33, 20 December 2010 (CET)