Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paper-hatted salesman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is the name we're going with? "Vendor" isn't good? "Blue and orange salesman" sort of implies he's blue and orange. His shirt is, but he's not. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 05:28, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | This is the name we're going with? "Vendor" isn't good? "Blue and orange salesman" sort of implies he's blue and orange. His shirt is, but he's not. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 05:28, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
:I know it sounds pretty silly, but it was the best name I could come up with. | :I know <s>it</s> the name sounds pretty silly, but it was the best name I could come up with. | ||
:"Vendor" is probably not a good idea, as it's too random. We have at least six articles on people who are vendors. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 19:58, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | :"Vendor" is probably not a good idea, as it's too random. We have at least six articles on people who are vendors. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 19:58, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
::We do? I'd like to see them. Perhaps they belong in a category? (Or do they already have one?) Hmm. I still think he needs a better name. Just can't think of one. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 20:02, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ::We do? I'd like to see them. Perhaps they belong in a category? (Or do they already have one?) Hmm. I still think he needs a better name. Just can't think of one. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 20:02, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
:::I agree. ([[:Category:Salespersons|This]] is the category. I'm wondering how you missed it...) [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 20:46, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | :::I agree. ([[:Category:Salespersons|This]] is the category. I'm wondering how you missed it...) [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 20:46, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
::::Prolly cuz I was looking for "vendor" and also I'm apparently too dumb to see the categories that this very page is in. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:43, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ::::Prolly cuz I was looking for "vendor" and also I'm apparently too dumb to see the categories that this very page is in. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 22:43, 2 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
:::::Look on the bright side: You didn't fail as hard as that guy who called this character a "blue and orange salesman". [rimshot] | |||
:::::I suppose you feel the same way about ''Yellow and red lawyer''. Do you have any suggestions to improve that name? ''Robot Attorney'' was, to my knowledge, the first name he had, but there are already [[:Category:Lawyers|two other characters sharing that designation]]. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 17:26, 3 September 2011 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 3 September 2011
Really?
This is the name we're going with? "Vendor" isn't good? "Blue and orange salesman" sort of implies he's blue and orange. His shirt is, but he's not. --Buddy 05:28, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- I know
itthe name sounds pretty silly, but it was the best name I could come up with. - "Vendor" is probably not a good idea, as it's too random. We have at least six articles on people who are vendors. Sanfazer 19:58, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- We do? I'd like to see them. Perhaps they belong in a category? (Or do they already have one?) Hmm. I still think he needs a better name. Just can't think of one. --Buddy 20:02, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- I agree. (This is the category. I'm wondering how you missed it...) Sanfazer 20:46, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- Prolly cuz I was looking for "vendor" and also I'm apparently too dumb to see the categories that this very page is in. --Buddy 22:43, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- Look on the bright side: You didn't fail as hard as that guy who called this character a "blue and orange salesman". [rimshot]
- I suppose you feel the same way about Yellow and red lawyer. Do you have any suggestions to improve that name? Robot Attorney was, to my knowledge, the first name he had, but there are already two other characters sharing that designation. Sanfazer 17:26, 3 September 2011 (CEST)
- Prolly cuz I was looking for "vendor" and also I'm apparently too dumb to see the categories that this very page is in. --Buddy 22:43, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- I agree. (This is the category. I'm wondering how you missed it...) Sanfazer 20:46, 2 September 2011 (CEST)
- We do? I'd like to see them. Perhaps they belong in a category? (Or do they already have one?) Hmm. I still think he needs a better name. Just can't think of one. --Buddy 20:02, 2 September 2011 (CEST)