Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rough Draft, Korea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Name) |
(→Name) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Rough Draft Studios website calls them [http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/studio_history.html "Rough Draft, Korea"], and the Korean website is RDKorea.net. I'd assume that is the correct designation. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] 02:33, 12 March 2011 (CET) | *Rough Draft Studios website calls them [http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/studio_history.html "Rough Draft, Korea"], and the Korean website is RDKorea.net. I'd assume that is the correct designation. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] 02:33, 12 March 2011 (CET) | ||
::You're right. I'll ask Aki for his opinion. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 23:12, 12 March 2011 (CET) | ::You're right. I'll ask Aki for his opinion. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 23:12, 12 March 2011 (CET) | ||
::He hasn't answered yet, but I'm sure he'd agree. Their site is pretty clear. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 19:18, 16 March 2011 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 16 March 2011
Name
Most websites I've visited call it Rough Draft Korea, including Wikipedia. Are both names acceptable? Sanfazer 01:33, 12 March 2011 (CET)
- Rough Draft Studios website calls them "Rough Draft, Korea", and the Korean website is RDKorea.net. I'd assume that is the correct designation. -- DeepSpaceHomer 02:33, 12 March 2011 (CET)