Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rough Draft, Korea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(→Name) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Most websites I've visited call it ''Rough Draft Korea'', including Wikipedia. Are both names acceptable? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 01:33, 12 March 2011 (CET) | Most websites I've visited call it ''Rough Draft Korea'', including Wikipedia. Are both names acceptable? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 01:33, 12 March 2011 (CET) | ||
*Rough Draft Studios website calls them [http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/studio_history.html "Rough Draft, Korea"], and the Korean website is RDKorea.net. I'd assume that is the correct designation. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] 02:33, 12 March 2011 (CET) | *Rough Draft Studios website calls them [http://www.roughdraftstudios.com/studio_history.html "Rough Draft, Korea"], and the Korean website is RDKorea.net. I'd assume that is the correct designation. -- [[User:DeepSpaceHomer|DeepSpaceHomer]] 02:33, 12 March 2011 (CET) | ||
::You're right. I'll ask Aki for his opinion. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 23:12, 12 March 2011 (CET) |
Revision as of 00:12, 13 March 2011
Name
Most websites I've visited call it Rough Draft Korea, including Wikipedia. Are both names acceptable? Sanfazer 01:33, 12 March 2011 (CET)
- Rough Draft Studios website calls them "Rough Draft, Korea", and the Korean website is RDKorea.net. I'd assume that is the correct designation. -- DeepSpaceHomer 02:33, 12 March 2011 (CET)
- You're right. I'll ask Aki for his opinion. Sanfazer 23:12, 12 March 2011 (CET)