Difference between revisions of "Talk:Waterfall family"

From The Infosphere, the Futurama Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
:Yeah I'm not too happy about that one. It made me ask the same thing.[[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 20:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
:Yeah I'm not too happy about that one. It made me ask the same thing.[[User:Anarchy Balsac|Anarchy Balsac]] 20:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
::The Encyclopod took Hutch's DNA, technically making it a descendant of Hutch. The commentators seem to think it counts, but I don't know if the writers will. How can you kill off a creature that houses the DNA of every extinct being? -[[User:Mini-Me|Mini-Me]] 23:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
::The Encyclopod took Hutch's DNA, technically making it a descendant of Hutch. The commentators seem to think it counts, but I don't know if the writers will. How can you kill off a creature that houses the DNA of every extinct being? -[[User:Mini-Me|Mini-Me]] 23:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
:::If that's true, then aren't the Encyclopod the descendant of all endangered species?  It's not like it is evolving from it, it is more a way of storing it.  I think your answer is; if the Encyclopod stores DNA of endangered species, it is to recreate these species when they go extinct, and since he has the DNA of a Waterfall, the new human the Encyclopod ''would'' create would technically be a clone of Hutch, making this another Waterfall. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 23:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:26, 28 February 2009

Featured.png Waterfall family appeared on the Infosphere's Main Page as the featured article for June, 2007. This article (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best produced by the Infosphere community. If you can update or improve it, please do.

oh dear...

  • forgive my stupidity, but after adding a quote to waterfall jr.'s bio, i somehow managed to totally mess up the rest of the page. no matter what i try, i cannot restore what was there before. i feel like a complete moron and would really appretiate it if some other, less brain-dead individual would fix it ~Tryzon
  • ok forget that now, it seems to have gone right again. i paniked there. never mind ~Tryzon

Another Waterfall?

In the commentary they hinted that there was another one. I think they said Phil Hendrie voiced the Encyclopod... does that really mean the Encyclopod counts? Or does it just mean that he's doomed to die in his next appearance? --Buddy 19:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I'm not too happy about that one. It made me ask the same thing.Anarchy Balsac 20:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The Encyclopod took Hutch's DNA, technically making it a descendant of Hutch. The commentators seem to think it counts, but I don't know if the writers will. How can you kill off a creature that houses the DNA of every extinct being? -Mini-Me 23:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
If that's true, then aren't the Encyclopod the descendant of all endangered species? It's not like it is evolving from it, it is more a way of storing it. I think your answer is; if the Encyclopod stores DNA of endangered species, it is to recreate these species when they go extinct, and since he has the DNA of a Waterfall, the new human the Encyclopod would create would technically be a clone of Hutch, making this another Waterfall. --SvipTalk 23:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)