Buddy13 Shouldn't it be "museum" ?
What about tables?
What do you think about tables for each section? Like this:
|Image||Movie Stars||B-Movie Stars||Porn Stars||TV Stars||Supermodels||TV Producers|
Katey Sagal's head (voice of Leela) left of Bender's head
| Charlie Chaplin
The horse's head from The Godfather
| Mimi Rogers
Sarah Michelle Gellar
| Traci Lords
Jill Big Breasts
Long Dong Silver
| Katey Sagal
| Claudia Schiffer
| Matt Groening|
David X. Cohen
This is for "Enterteinment" and another could be for "Politics". — TheFry23:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, it looks all messed up in the "Edit box", but it looks good in the finished page. What do you think? — TheFry22:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
What about more information and a sortable list?
A rather vertical list with sortable columns showing a little bit more information could be useful. Potential columns: - names (of heads), - category/location (e.g. presidents, movie-star, porn, etc.), - first episode, - no of episodes, - special (e.g. when actually speaking, seen outside the museum, etc.) - small image (if available). Special information, eg about the "Hall of Presidents", goes to another paragraph and anchor. In fact, this page could be limited to general information about the museum itself and the "Hall of Presidents" only. The entire list of heads could move to this page or a brand new page called "List of Heads". No matter what page, the list needs to be nicer. --Don Felipe (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2011 (CEST)