Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amazon Women in the Mood"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Polantaris (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I was looking at the trivia note and saw this: ''When Leela looks into the ripples in the pond caused by vibration's her reflection momentarily gives her the appearance of a two eyed human, foreshadowing the events in the episode "The Cyber House Rules". '' | I was looking at the trivia note and saw this: ''When Leela looks into the ripples in the pond caused by vibration's her reflection momentarily gives her the appearance of a two eyed human, foreshadowing the events in the episode "The Cyber House Rules". '' | ||
This seems very unlikely. Unless the creators said otherwise, it seems more like it was done for effect, and people are reading too much into tiny details. I recommend removing it, or at least adding a "This could possibly be a foreshadowing..," as if it were an absolute. [[User:Polantaris|Polantaris]] 06:52, 29 November 2010 (CET) | This seems very unlikely. Unless the creators said otherwise, it seems more like it was done for effect, and people are reading too much into tiny details. I recommend removing it, or at least adding a "This could possibly be a foreshadowing..," as if it were an absolute. [[User:Polantaris|Polantaris]] 06:52, 29 November 2010 (CET) | ||
:I agree. And I think that adding the "foreshadowing" part is better than removing the whole thing. I'm gonna do it now. [[User:San Saber|San Saber]] 00:43, 30 November 2010 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 01:43, 30 November 2010
i beleive that the character list is quite incopmlete.
Trivia Note
I was looking at the trivia note and saw this: When Leela looks into the ripples in the pond caused by vibration's her reflection momentarily gives her the appearance of a two eyed human, foreshadowing the events in the episode "The Cyber House Rules". This seems very unlikely. Unless the creators said otherwise, it seems more like it was done for effect, and people are reading too much into tiny details. I recommend removing it, or at least adding a "This could possibly be a foreshadowing..," as if it were an absolute. Polantaris 06:52, 29 November 2010 (CET)
- I agree. And I think that adding the "foreshadowing" part is better than removing the whole thing. I'm gonna do it now. San Saber 00:43, 30 November 2010 (CET)